Author: David Lewis

The Rogue Agent goes to the archives!
  • Infinite Banking: (Almost) Everything You Need To Know

    How To Model Infinite Banking Using The Borrowing Strategy Calculator

    What Is Infinite Banking?

    There are so many articles and posts about infinite banking. Why add to the pile? Well… if I didn’t think I had anything valuable to add to the topic, I wouldn’t have bothered… and I’ll just leave it at that. I’ll let you be the judge from here on out.

    First off, there are essentially two aspects to infinite banking: The concept/product/hard numbers and… the psychology behind the concept. Almost everyone wants to know the numbers first, and so… the marketers, insurance agents, journalists, bloggers, and everyone else talked, does videos about, and writes (often poorly) about the former, and almost no one (well… no one, really) writes about the latter.

    In this post, I will cover the concept, product used, and hard numbers behind how it works. I’ll cover the psychology aspect of it in another post because it deserves its own treatment.

    Ok, so to begin with, The Infinite Banking Concept®, as envisioned and created by R. Nelson Nash, is the process of creating your own private “banking system” by utilizing specially-designed dividend-paying whole life insurance policies to hold all the money you’ll need for all your future financing needs. A financial advisor or life insurance agent might also suggest using indexed universal life insurance. But if you want to stick to the original teachings of Nash, you’ll use whole life.

    Either way, the point is to control “the banking function” in your life as opposed to letting traditional banks be in control of it (and, as a consequence, in control of you). Traditional loans benefit the bank. Life insurance loans benefit you.

    Whole life insurance is a type of cash value life insurance policy combining both a death benefit and a cash surrender value. The life insurance cash surrender value represents equity in the policy, which many policyholders and even your friendly neighborhood life insurance agent regards as “savings”. I’ve seen a lot of infinite banking pros go so far as to describe it as your own personal bank which allows you to avoid dealing with traditional banks.

    Personally, I wouldn’t go that far with it.

    It’s not a bank. It’s not a bank account. It’s permanent life insurance.

    And, if you truly understand how a whole life insurance policy works, including all of its many tax benefits, you won’t confuse yourself about being your own bank. You’re not your own bank. Rather, you might think of it as being your own banker, and merely utilizing whole life insurance as a tool to get the job done.

    Subtle, but important, difference.

    The Infinite Banking Concept: The Basic Process

    To make The Infinite Banking Concept® work as described by Nash, you need a whole life policy and —this is important — cash flow. The original concept (which has been lost in the modern marketing messages) emphasized the need for high cash flow and the need for regular financing. Nash himself promoted the idea to forestry and logging businesses, as his own background was in forestry, and using whole life insurance was a great way to finance business operations compared to more traditional lending options.

    Some businesses are cash flow heavy, but also need to take on debt regularly to finance their business activities, and these businesses are the perfect candidate for this kind of financial strategy. Think forestry and logging businesses, farms, construction, commercial trucking, some medical imaging and specialized healthcare businesses, private aviation businesses, franchise restaurants, waste management businesses, manufacturing and CNC machine shops, corporate hospitality type businesses, auto dealerships, commercial printing companies, oil and gas companies, commercial laundromats, shipping companies, and so on. Or… businesses that have a really long Cash Conversion Cycle, and are holding inventory for long periods of time. Or… businesses that regularly use accounts receivable factoring —whole life policy loans are going to be a lot less expensive than taking the hit from a factoring company. Or… businesses with large, somewhat regular, CapEx.

    And… because of the guaranteed nature of the whole life policy, financing things this way is probably a much lower risk than what they are doing now.

    Unlike other types of financing, whole life policy owners have complete control over the repayment schedule. Meaning, you can “dial up” or “dial down” the loan repayment, and no one from the insurance company will harass you for a loan payment. Cash flow tight this month? Skip the loan payment. Strong cash flow? Pay extra. This aspect of whole life policy loans give the policyholder an incredible advantage, but also some risk if the loan payments are skipped long enough and the cash value is depleted to a point where the policy is at risk of lapsing.

    I mean… if a business owner is financially responsible, and able to pay his debts, the risk of this strategy is very low, and the upside is absolutely tremendous. But again… the strategy was specifically intended for high cash flow businesses with ongoing financing needs.

    It’s not that other types of businesses, or individuals, can’t use infinite banking. It’s just that it isn’t the target audience. High cash flow, and a regular need for borrowing money —that’s the target audience. And… frankly, not everyone fits that demographic. That doesn’t mean whole life insurance can’t be used by anyone else, obviously. If you have the cash flow to support the premiums, and you regularly borrow money for business needs, then this is probably going to work out very well for you.

    The types of accumulation-focused whole life policies used for infinite banking are, generally speaking, issued by mutual life insurers. The policy is, in essence, an extension of the life insurer’s general investment account (GIA). When you buy a whole life policy, you’re not merely buying a policy. You’re buying the underlying company. Specifically, the company’s GIA, which powers all of its insurance products.

    Here’s the basic idea of how money moves into and out of that general account, powering the whole life policy:

    How infinite banking works. How money moves through a life insurance company, into and out of a dividend-paying whole life insurance policy.
    How money moves into and out of a life insurance company.

    Step 1: Fund The Policy

    Fund a specially-designed dividend-paying whole life insurance policy to rapidly build up its cash value. Funding can be done with either a lump-sum payment, an annual, semi-annual, quarterly, or monthly premium payment, or a combination of a lump sum and ongoing scheduled premiums. If you’re having trouble finding the money to fund a policy, read How To Do Infinite Banking When You Have Low Funds.

    Step 2: Borrow Against The Policy’s Cash Value

    When there’s sufficient cash value in the policy, you can borrow against it when needed for major purchases or to make investments in other businesses. The loan originates from your insurer, which you are a part owner or member of. Unlike traditional loans, there’s no credit check or financial underwriting. You just request the money, and they give it to you, no questions asked (except where to send the money).

    Your loan is collateralized by an equal amount of money from your policy. You own the insurance policy outright, and have full control over this credit. It can never be taken away from you or canceled. Additionally, your policy’s guaranteed cash value growth never stops (even with loans outstanding!), allowing you to fund purchases now without sacrificing future financial plans and goals.

    Step 3: Repay The Policy Loan And Add Additional Money To Your Policy

    Repay your loan to your insurance company at a rate and repayment schedule you choose and control, and add additional money to your policy through special policy riders, to grow your policy values and build a larger credit line for future purchases.

    Your insurer will help you build additional credit through guaranteed interest payments and non-guaranteed dividend payments. Dividend payments (called “divisible surplus”) are generated through lower-than-expected expenses and profits of the insurer, which are yours to keep as part owner of the company. Dividend payments are not guaranteed to be paid but, once paid, become part of the guaranteed values of the policy and can never be lost.

    Advantages of Infinite Banking

    • You build, own, and control your personal credit, not a 3rd party lender or credit bureau;
    • No external authority can control or dictate how and when you can finance your needs;
    • You pay yourself the interest that would otherwise go to another lender, saving yourself hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions of dollars in interest over your lifetime;
    • You can implement infinite banking at your own pace. No need to rush or conform to traditional financial planning rules;
    • You’ll have more control over your cash flow; your whole life policy can be used to cover short-term cash flow needs like covering employee paychecks until your accounts receivables are paid. It can also cover longer-term cash flow needs like working capital;
    • It simplifies personal finance by making you the center of your own financial universe; you operate in an economic environment you control;
    • You can start infinite banking with modest funds, or use lump sums to “front load” a policy;

    Advantages of Using Whole Life Insurance Policies for Infinite Banking

    • Policy values grow at a guaranteed rate for your entire life, while premiums remain level and do not increase;
    • Policy values are guaranteed against loss, secured by a 100% reserve system, and are backed by some of the most financially stable companies in the world. A reinsurance net and State Guaranty Fund provides several extra layers of protection;
    • Dividends can be substantial and add a significant amount of money to the policy;
    • You get tax-deferred growth on all the money in your policy, and tax free access to cash values for any reason (or no reason at all);
    • It can be used as an emergency fund or to pay off medical bills or other personal debts;
    • It is, for all intents and purposes, a “bulletproof” financial product;
    • Life insurance is a private asset, meaning it does not show up in public records and is not included on your taxes. No one will know you have a whole life contract unless you tell them, not even your creditors;
    • Life insurance products are an alternative to other tax-advantaged accounts, retirement plans, mutual funds, and other investments, while still giving you special tax advantages like tax free access to your savings when you need it;
    • Life insurance loans require no credit check, and no lengthy applications. You simply fill out and sign a short 1-page loan form, detailing the amount of money you want from your insurer (you don’t even need to state the reason why you want the money or what you will spend it on——it’s completely private);
    • It’s not correlated with other asset classes, and has a structural advantage over other, riskier, assets and investments;
    • Policy loans are cheaper than just about any other financing method available. Net cost of an insurance loan from many insurers is 2% or less;
    • Because every loan is secured by an equal amount of money from the policy, it’s impossible to be “upside down” on your loan.
    • It’s one of the simplest, and safest, financial products you can buy;
    • Policy values are generally protected against creditor claims (some states have stronger protections than others);
    • Many whole life policies allow you to spend the death benefit before you die if you are diagnosed with a terminal or permanent chronic illness, and which results in you being too sick or hurt to live without some form of assistance from others.
    • The policy continues to grow, even when you borrow money, allowing you to accomplish current financial goals without sacrificing future ones.

    Disadvantages of Infinite Banking

    There’s nothing wrong with the core ideas of infinite banking, but there are some disadvantages to the way it’s commonly practiced and implemented.

    For example:

    • Infinite banking requires you to be an “honest banker”, pay back all loans, with interest, and often at a rate that exceeds what the insurer requires. While you do have a lot of flexibility in the repayment schedule, unpaid policy loans continue to accrue interest and might eventually cause the policy to lapse if they remain unpaid for extremely long periods of time. Also… many people have negative emotions surrounding debt, and resist paying back loans at an appropriate repayment rate. This attitude will eventually crash your infinite banking system.
    • Expenses tend to rise to match current income, making it impossible to save money. Infinite banking requires a strong saving habit, which conflicts with many people’s current lifestyle and spending habits.
    • Many individuals succumb to The Arrival Syndrome. They believe they already “know it all”, and thus stop learning, growing, and eventually feel as though they already have “enough” life insurance. They think of whole life insurance as an “investment tactic” instead of a financial strategy.
    • Many people are addicted to “rate of return”. Specifically, short-term interest rates. They let “rate of return” dictate their decisions. For Infinite Banking to work, a policyholder must treat rate of return as a secondary consideration, and focus more on the volume of interest earned and paid. Volume of interest refers to the actual amount of money earned and paid on loans.
    • An individual is sometimes unwilling to make “becoming your own banker” a way of life. However, Infinite Banking is a way of life, and requires entirely new habits to be formed in order to be successful long-term.
    • Some individuals lack conviction in what they’re doing, and so they fall into old habits which undermines the Infinite Banking strategy and way of life.
    • Some individuals try to take on too much at once, move too fast, get in over their head, then fail. Infinite Banking takes time to implement, time to change old habits, time to restructure finances. It requires persistence, but also patience.

    That covers the high-level stuff. I wrote an entire blog post covering all of the downsides to The Infinite Banking Concept®.

    Disadvantages of Using Whole Life Insurance for Infinite Banking

    • The forced savings aspect of whole life can feel like a “ball and chain” for some individuals. Some policies can be made more flexible by relying on non-guaranteed elements, but all policies have a required base premium which must be paid each and every year through one of several means;
    • Requires long-term thinking and patience. Rate of return is negative in the early years of the policy, and are slow to ramp up. It may take 6-9 years to break even (i.e. for cash surrender value to equal premium payments);
    • Borrowing against a life insurance policy reduces the net policy values (both cash surrender value and death benefit) of the policy, which might be needed if you die prematurely;
    • If the policy lapses for any reason, and there’s a gain in the policy (total cash value exceeds total premium payments), income taxes will be due on the gain;
    • Borrowing against the policy may increase the risk of policy lapse, especially if the policyholder fails to repay the loan or if the policy is underfunded;
    • Some life insurance companies discourage policyholders from using their policy for Infinite Banking, and discourage any infinite banking agent from selling “Infinite Banking policies”.

    History of Infinite Banking

    Infinite Banking was originally conceived and created in the 1980s by R. Nelson Nash, then later introduced to the public through his book, Becoming Your Own Banker: The Infinite Banking Concept (now called “Unlock the Infinite Banking Concept”).

    It is still the best source for understanding the original concept and how it was implemented when Nash first created it.

    A competing book called, The Bank On Yourself Revolution: Fire Your Banker, Bypass Wall Street, and Take Control of Your Own Financial Future, by Pamela Yellen, promises to teach you an “enhanced” version of this concept. It is more conceptual than Nash’s book, with fewer “by the numbers” examples. Yellen’s version of this concept includes the use of special term life insurance riders, which might allow a policyholder to pay more premium into the policy than Nash’s original idea allowed for.

    While Nash presents an entirely new formulation of the idea of using whole life insurance as a source of personal credit, and gives it a name people can really grab onto, the seeds of that idea date back to Benjamin Franklin’s last will and testament.

    Shortly before his death, Franklin had his will amended to include a provision for a 200-year insurance policy that would be used to help apprentices (and later, entrepreneurs) get their ideas off the ground. The insurance policy allowed apprentices to borrow money from the insurance fund at 5% interest. Over time, the fund would continue to make loans to many thousands of individuals and would eventually be used to fund city beautification and infrastructure projects for the cities of Philadelphia and Boston.

    This idea of using an insurance policy that would last for several hundred years, making countless loans to those in need and being continually refueled by borrowers, actually worked.

    Others tried similar ideas, with varying degrees of success.

    In the late 1800s and early 1900s, John Wanamaker——the pioneer of the modern department store——popularized the idea of using whole life insurance, specifically, as a form of credit that one could borrow against to start and grow a business.

    John Wanamaker
    By Bain News Service, publisher. [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

    At the time, many of his peers thought he was crazy for insisting on carrying minimal to no debt and for wanting to manage his own money and self-finance his business using whole life insurance and endowment policies.

    Wanamaker ignored them and pursued his own vision and path.

    When asked about life insurance, Wanamaker freely gave his opinion about it, and why he funded his whole life insurance policies before reinvesting in his own business:

    “Twenty years ago I had a capital of about a half million dollars. I then realized that a business man with a half million of capital and a million and a half of insurance on his life would have better credit than one with a half million of capital and no insurance — so I took the insurance. I now find that trading on the credit it created I made more profit than if the money which went into insurance had gone directly into my business.”

    To the members of the National Association of Life Insurance Underwriters, he plainly stated his reasons for owning 62 whole life policies (from the business biography of John Wanamaker):

    “I simply worked out five conclusions as the result of my own thinking, without any moving cause except my own judgment.

    “First: that at the time I knew I was insurable and I could not be sure of immunity from accident or ill-health and it might be that at some future time I would not be insurable. This was the first step to the building up of my 62 policies.

    “Second: that life insurance was one of the best forms of investment because from the moment it was made it was good for all it cost and carried with it a guarantee and there was protection in that investment that I could not get in any other.

    “Third: that life insurance in the long run was a saving fund that not only saved but took care of my deposits and gave the opportunity for the possible profits that not infrequently returned principal and interest and profit.

    “Fourth: that life insurance, regarded from the standpoint of quick determination, was more profitable than any other investment I could make.

    “… I did not know what life insurance really meant to me until my policies were falling due—and I had a large sum of money with which I began to build my Philadelphia store. I would not have been prepared to start my building when I did if I had not saved $2,500,000 little by little.”

    Wanamaker paid over $800,000 in premium payments which, in today’s dollars, would be equal to roughly $22 million. His whole life policy’s surrender values were worth an estimated $70 million (in today’s dollars). His insurance and death benefits were worth even more.

    At that time, he was the most insured man in America, only to be outdone by his son. At his death, Wanamaker’s business empire, financed largely with life insurance policies, was worth more than $100 million. Today, it would be worth many billions of dollars.

    Infinite Banking: Controlling the Banking Function

    The primary benefit of infinite banking is the idea that you control the banking function in your life, as opposed to a 3rd party lender or a credit bureau.

    The life insurance policy serves as collateral for all policy loans. And, that policy’s value is ultimately driven by your own actions (i.e. premium payments and loan repayments). Thus, you are responsible for building up your own personal (or business) credit, and you also control how that credit is used. You may leave the capital with the insurer to invest, or you may use that capital for your own investments and other purchases.

    In the context of infinite banking, the banking function refers to the process of financing purchases. Controlling the banking function means controlling the financing of your purchases with capital you own and control. You control both the capital and the mechanism used for financing, while an insurance company holds and manages the funds for you.

    A fundamental idea of Infinite Banking is, ‘you finance everything you buy’. You’ll either pay interest to someone else, or lose interest on your savings when you pay cash.

    Either way, there’s an interest cost. It’s either implied or explicit.

    Everyone is familiar with explicit interest expense. It’s the interest you pay on a personal loan, credit card, mortgage, or some other debt.

    Implicit interest expense is opportunity cost. Opportunity cost is the cost of making one decision versus another. It represents money you would have had if you had made a different choice. For example, if you have the opportunity to make $1 million by investing your savings, but you choose to pay off your mortgage with your savings instead, then you incur an opportunity cost. Assume your savings is $150,000—enough to pay off your mortgage of $150,000. By paying off the mortgage with your savings, you give up the $1 million of future savings. That is your opportunity cost.

    The goal of Infinite Banking is to account for that opportunity cost, and allow you to finance all the things you would have to finance anyway—the house, your future investments, and more.

    Does It Really Work Like You Say?

    Does infinite banking work?

    Yes, it really works. I wouldn’t have wasted all this time researching it, writing about it, and implementing it in my own personal life if it didn’t work.

    Here’s the thing: “Infinite Banking” is a modern marketing name given to the centuries-old practice of building, owning, managing, and maintaining personal credit through participating (dividend-paying) whole life insurance. This strategy isn’t exactly new. And it’s more than a mere sales concept or gimmick. And, while the idea has been around forever, Nash gave it wings, a marketing budget, and elaborated on the finer details of exactly how a person might use whole life to self-finance all of one’s needs.

    Nash’s vision was for individuals to “control the banking function at the you-and-me level” using dividend-paying whole life insurance. For whatever reason, this idea never caught on in the personal finance blogosphere or with personal finance gurus. They hate it because of the word “life insurance”. Can’t get past it. They have a mental block about it.

    Anywho, the underlying premise and idea of The Infinite Banking Concept®, and all other similar ideas, is to build up significant capital, control that capital with contractually-guaranteed access to the money, and thus have total control and ownership over one’s own personal credit. This is something that must be done with some sort of permanent life insurance policy, as term life insurance does not have a cash value component.

    When money is needed, the owner of a well-funded “infinite banking life insurance policy” borrows money from the life insurance company. A high value is placed on the capital inside the policy, and loan payments made to the insurer are generally in excess of what the insurer charges for the loan. In essence, the policyholder is recognizing the cost of capital in his policy and treating access to his money as a loan instead of a cash withdrawal that has no value. In the corporate world, the counterpart to this idea is something referred to as “Economic Value Added” (EVA).

    When world-famous investor Warren Buffett talks about charging managers for the use of Berkshire Hathaway’s capital at a double-digit interest rate, he is implicitly using the core concepts of “Infinite Banking” inside his company (which happens to be an insurance company). During one shareholder meeting, Buffett elaborated on the idea, stating that he places a high value on Berkshire’s capital (higher than other lending institutions), and he pushes that cost onto managers (and anyone else) who wants to use the company’s capital.

    This really cuts to the heart of the matter.

    To successfully implement any variant of the infinite banking strategy, one must first value oneself (specifically, one’s own welfare and financial future) over others, placing a higher value on one’s own savings and capital than the capital and savings of others. This will become more apparent as you continue reading through this guide.

    One of the foundational premises of all variants of Infinite Banking is the idea that you finance everything you buy——you either pay interest to someone else, or you lose interest on your money by cashing out your savings and investments to pay cash.

    Even worse, by paying cash, you leave yourself with constantly diminished savings. The following illustration (figure 1) shows what happens when an individual always pays cash using the well-known “sinking fund” method to build up savings or capital, then depletes the fund to make purchases or investments in business:

    The sinking fund method illustration
    Building up savings or capital, then depleting it to make purchases or investments in business. This process results in net zero capital accumulation over time, and diminishes the long-term value of one’s savings or capital.

    The blue bars in the graph represent capital accumulation. After 5 years, the fund is depleted and the cash is used to make a purchase or invest into a business. By “paying cash”, one always erases long-term capital accumulation, leaving one with zero net capital every time the fund is used to make purchases or investments in a business. This process could be repeated an infinite number of times, with no net growth in capital accumulation or savings. Contrast this with an “infinite banking” type method of building credit through a specially-designed whole life contract, and borrowing against the policy for major purchases or to make investments in a business:

    A graph showing the power of continuously compounding cash value, even when loans are taken against the policy.
    Policy loans allow cash value to grow uninterrupted inside a whole life policy.

    The blue arrows show the policy always growing, regardless of loan activity. The black line shows the effect of loans on policy values. Even if loans are subtracted from the gross guaranteed policy values (ignoring dividends completely), there is always net positive capital accumulation.

    Non-guaranteed dividends only add to this base cash value. Either way, gross cash value inside a whole life contract always grows, regardless of loan activity. Figures 1 and 2 also show that there is no way to avoid an interest cost on purchases you make. You pay for it either directly or indirectly. The choice is yours.

    By putting your own welfare (wealthfare?) ahead of others, and placing a high value on your own savings and capital, you gain a tremendous advantage over others who fritter away their money or who place a very low value on their savings and capital. You also give your future self a tremendous advantage that you would not otherwise have.

    The contrast here is stark, uncompromising, and unequivocal.

    Placing zero value on your capital and savings produces a zero long-term net value. Placing a high value on your capital and savings creates lifelong capital accumulation and savings, and thus, long-term financial security and net positive value.

    It’s true that some individuals may potentially gain temporary, short-term, advantages (or merely the appearance of an advantage) by valuing others over one’s own self. But, such “other-ism” strategies are always short-term in nature. Those short-term thinking individuals are easily outflanked and outcompeted by individuals who value one’s self, one’s savings, and one’s welfare over others, think and plan long-term, and who engage in long-term financial strategies.

    Note: This is not about putting others down, hurting or injuring others, or even defeating others. It is about raising oneself up to the highest standard possible.

    In the context of financial security and independence, this is the ultimate choice ahead of you. Dividend-paying whole life insurance is simply a tool, a means to that end.

    As a policy owner or member of a mutual life insurance company, you are also entitled to vote on important business matters to influence the direction of your insurance carrier and to ensure your (and its) long-term success.

    Infinite Banking Examples

    Example 1: Financing Policy Premiums

    An easy way to get started with Infinite Banking is to simply finance your own policy’s premiums. Some of my policyholders did this just to “test the waters”. Every insurance company — auto, home, life — charges a finance charge for paying monthly (or any other mode except annual). This finance charge is the cost of doing business with the company.

    Finance charges exist because premiums are due in advance (before the insurer will agree to provide coverage), but most people cannot afford to pay their insurance premiums in advance, so… the company agrees to finance the annual premium for policyholders and break that annual premium up into smaller payments. However, if you start out paying monthly premiums, and build up cash inside a whole life contract, eventually you can use that money to finance your own life insurance premiums.

    Let’s look at a real policy to get an idea of how this works. Here are the options this policyholder has for paying his premiums:

    PAYMENT MODEANNUALSEMI-ANNUALQUARTERLYMONTHLY
    AMOUNT$3,451.71$1,763.82$900.89$300.30

    Insurance carriers typically charge anywhere from 7.5% APR to 9.5% APR, and sometimes higher. Yet, the average APR on a policy loan (as of 2023) is 6% or less. Meaning, it’s often cheaper to finance your own life insurance premiums using your built-in loan provision than it is to let the insurer charge their standard rate for monthly premiums.

    After three years paying monthly premiums of $1,000 (and paying the insurer’s monthly finance charge), this policyholder decided it made more sense to finance his own policy premiums using premium loans (a special kind of policy loan used to fund premium payments).

    Here’s how that looked for his policy:

    YRNET PREM OUTLAYNET CASH SURR VALUEPREM LOANLOAN REPMNTINT CHARGEEXCESS TO PUA RIDERNET DEATH BENEFIT
    1$12,000$7,905$0$0$0$0$431,083
    2$12,000$16,677$0$0$0$0$457,827
    3$12,000$27,192$0$0$0$0$484,605
    4$12,000$40,662$3,451.71$3,603.60$86$65$515,939
    5$12,000$54,543$3,451.71$3,603.60$86$65$544,631
    6$12,000$68,688$3,451.71$3,603.60$86$65$573,167
    7$12,000$83,614$3,451.71$3,603.60$86$65$601,896
    8$12,000$99,336$3,451.71$3,603.60$86$65$630,796
    9$12,000$115,906$3,451.71$3,603.60$86$65$659,878
    10$12,000$133,378$3,451.71$3,603.60$86$65$689,173

    This policyholder’s base premium (without paid-up additional insurance premiums) was $300.30 per month ($3,603.60/yr). By financing his own premium with the policy’s cash value, the insurer agrees to switch the payment mode to “annual” and eliminate the normal finance charge, reducing his base premium to $3,451.71.

    Then, the policyholder agrees to repay the premium loan over the next 12 months. But, when he does this, he recognizes the actual cost of that premium. In other words, the insurer was charging him $151.89 per year as a finance charge to spread out the annual premium into 12 monthly payments ($3,603 – $3,451.71 = $151.89)… so, he repays his premium loan with the same amount he was paying when he paid premiums monthly ($300.30).

    Of course, the insurer charges loan interest on premium loans. But, the loan interest is much less than the finance charge for paying monthly premiums ($86 vs $151), allowing the policyholder to net ~$65 every year. That $65 is put back into the policy through the paid-up additions rider, increasing policy values.

    This method of paying premiums grows the policy more quickly than if he had paid the insurer a premium finance charge. And the net result is his policy is more efficient and costs are reduced, improving his policy’s growth. Processing the premium loan each year is not a burden. The policyholder can either initiate the loan himself with a simple phone call, or the insurance company will do it automatically for him under his policy’s automatic premium loan provision.

    Now… this is a cool little gimmick, and I don’t know if this little arbitrage will continue to work forever, but… as long as the insurance carrier’s modal charge is higher than the policy loan rate, it will work.

    Example 2: Buying A Vehicle Or Machinery

    This policyholder started her whole life contract by using some accumulated savings as well as monthly premiums paid out of regular income:

    YRNET PREM OUTLAYNET CASH SURR VALUENET DEATH BENEFIT
    1$10,110.45$6,688.50$136,671.15
    2$10,110.45$14,487.90$136,868.55
    3$10,110.45$24,290.00$137,081.70

    As you can see, the first 3 years of her life insurance policy are heavily funded with just over $10,000 of annual premium. Some of this premium came from personal savings, while some of it came from monthly premiums paid out of income. Her premium purchased $136,671.15 of death benefit and gave her $6,688.50 in cash surrender value. In the early years of her policy, the annual returns are negative. Not ideal, but normal for whole life insurance.

    The benefits come in the 4th year and beyond:

    YRNET PREM OUTLAYNET CASH SURR VALUEPOLICY LOAN FOR CARLOAN REPAYMENTEXCESS TO PUA RIDERNET DEATH BENEFIT
    4$10,110.45$22,535.00$10,000.00$2,549.76$0$137,380.95
    5$11,427.15$34,597.50$0$2,549.76$0$144,458.37
    6$9,793.35$45,818.85$0$2,549.76$0$148,658.90
    7$6,292.65$54,145.35$0$2,549.76$0$155,614.57
    8$4,690.35$61,329.45$0$2,549.76$1,626.05$163,053.14
    9$4,690.35$68,898.90$0$0$0$170,748.59
    10$4,690.35$76,856.85$0$0$0$178,717.46

    When it came time for the policyholder to buy a vehicle, she used a policy loan instead of borrowing money from somewhere else. Of course, she had cash available to buy the car, so why not just use the cash?

    Had she paid for the vehicle in cash, she would have lost interest on that money until she was able to save it up again. By using a loan from her insurer, she was able to buy herself a new (new to her) vehicle without sacrificing her future savings — something she had always struggled with in the past. Unlike conventional loans, loans from a life insurance company are non-amortizing. Meaning, the insurer does not require a specific loan repayment schedule. The policyholder can create her own repayment schedule.

    Because her insurer does not require any principal payment, they only charge interest on the loan. Specifically, interest accrues daily on the outstanding principal balance and is billed at the end of the year.

    This little quirk inherent in her policy allows the policyholder to repay the principal of her loan during the year before paying interest. Her loan works in the exact opposite manner of every other retail or commercially-available loan. Again, because interest is assessed only on outstanding principal balances, accrued interest will decrease as that principal balance is paid down during the year. And, because of this, it dramatically reduces the total amount of interest paid to the company. Additionally, she can pay more money to herself—money that would have otherwise gone to her credit union as interest payments. Instead, this money goes right back into her policy to buy more paid-up additional life insurance, which generates more cash value and dividends.

    The policyholder’s insurance carrier also practices a loan method called “direct recognition”. This means when she borrows money against her life insurance policy, the company changes her dividend rate to match the loan rate, in effect giving her the interest she paid on the loan back to her as a dividend at the end of the year. While dividends are not guaranteed, it can help make loans an even more efficient method of borrowing money.

    In this case, the policyholder pockets $1,626.05 in cash—interest which would have gone to a car dealership’s financing arm or to her credit union. To be clear, this money is not interest she owes to the insurer, either. This is cash-money she pays to herself. She can choose to put this money into her savings account or some other investment. But, instead, she puts this money right back into her whole life contract. By doing this, she will increase her cash value and thus the amount she can borrow in the future.

    She can repeat this process an infinite number of times.

    And, this is an important part of the process. The more times you do this, the better it gets. Like I mentioned above, this process works very well for businesses that regularly need to borrow money for business needs, like buying vehicles, or machinery, or companies that do factoring (life insurance policy loans will be much, much, cheaper than factoring), or companies that are seasonal or that have a cash drag created by really long cash conversion cycles.

    Whole Life Policy Examples

    Most whole life policies sold today have a low early-year cash surrender value, especially in the first several years of the policy. It’s typical to see a whole life contract with a first-year cash surrender value of $0. But, no one really enjoys paying thousands of dollars in whole life premiums and seeing a big fat goose egg in the first year.

    A Basic Whole Life Policy

    Here’s an example of a typical “all base” whole life contract (click to see full size):

    A traditional whole life policy, paid up at age 121
    This is an “off the shelf” whole life policy, typical of what many life insurance agents sell. This particular policy is payable to age 120.

    An Infinite Banking Whole Life Policy Example

    Here is an example of a classic IBC whole life policy, as described in Nelson Nash’s book, Becoming Your Own Banker: The Infinite Banking Concept:

    A Classic IBC Policy

    Here is an example of a classic IBC whole life policy, as described in Nelson Nash’s book, Becoming Your Own Banker: The Infinite Banking Concept:

    This is a classic “infinite banking” policy design. High level premiums are paid over a long period of time. A healthy percent of the premium is paid as paid-up additions premium which accelerates the cash value growth of the policy compared to an “all base” policy.

    Classic IBC whole life policy illustration

    An IBC whole life contract typically has higher early-year cash surrender value than a traditional whole life contract. The first year cash surrender value in these policies is often equal to between 60% and 80% of the first year’s premium paid. And, subsequent annual net growth of the policy’s cash value is extraordinary.

    As with all participating (dividend-paying) whole life policies, the whole life contracts used with The Infinite Banking Concept® are guaranteed insurance products. All policy values are guaranteed. In addition to the guaranteed growth rate, the participating nature of the policy means policyholders have the opportunity to earn dividends. Dividends are not guaranteed to be paid in any specific year, and are based on a combination of savings from mortality and operating expenses and gains from investment returns. If earned dividends are reinvested into the policy (i.e. used to buy additional single-premium paid-up whole life insurance), those dividends then become part of the guaranteed cash value and death benefit of the policy. This dividend enhancement also alters the trajectory of the initial guaranteed growth of the policy each and every year a dividend is paid.

    Infinite banking also involves using policy loans to buy things——sometimes consumer goods, but more often investments or valuable assets that appreciate in value. The life insurance cash value actually becomes credit for the loan. The more cash value you have in your policy, the more personal credit you have to borrow against when needed. This is credit you have complete ownership and control over. No one can take it away from you, and you determine how much credit you want to build up inside your policy.

    Because cash values are guaranteed, your personal credit and credit line is guaranteed. The risks inherent in traditional investing accounts don’t exist inside the whole life insurance policy. For some, this implication of this idea is revolutionary and refreshing. For others, it’s terrifying.

    Building, owning, and controlling one’s own personal credit is a huge responsibility. Some feel they’re not ready for it. Others are terrified by the idea that they (and they alone) will determine their own creditworthiness. And some are still hypnotized by an anticivilization that teaches them it’s wrong to have that much control over one’s own life.

    Regardless of which path one chooses, it doesn’t change the facts. Those who choose to build, own, and control their own credit through whole life insurance will have the ultimate financial advantage in life.

    90/10 Split IBC Whole Life Policy

    Here is an example of a 90/10 split IBC whole life policy. This policy design emphasizes short-term cash value growth and high illustrated IRR at the expense of long-term cash value accumulation. Some critics argue that this design is contrary to Nash’s original vision of infinite banking and whole life insurance policy design:

    This is a classic “infinite banking” policy design. High level premiums are paid for the first 7 years, then premiums must be reduced to avoid MEC status.

    90/10 split IBC whole life policy illustration

    An IBC whole life contract typically has higher early-year cash surrender value than a traditional whole life contract. The first year cash surrender value in these policies is often equal to between 60% and 80% of the first year’s premium paid. And, subsequent annual net growth of the policy’s cash value is extraordinary.

    As with all participating (dividend-paying) whole life policies, the whole life contracts used with The Infinite Banking Concept® are guaranteed insurance products. All policy values are guaranteed. In addition to the guaranteed growth rate, the participating nature of the policy means policyholders have the opportunity to earn dividends. Dividends are not guaranteed to be paid in any specific year, and are based on a combination of savings from mortality and operating expenses and gains from investment returns. If earned dividends are reinvested into the policy (i.e. used to buy additional single-premium paid-up whole life insurance), those dividends then become part of the guaranteed cash value and death benefit of the policy. This dividend enhancement also alters the trajectory of the initial guaranteed growth of the policy each and every year a dividend is paid.

    Infinite banking also involves using policy loans to buy things——sometimes consumer goods, but more often investments or valuable assets that appreciate in value. The life insurance cash value actually becomes credit for the loan. The more cash value you have in your policy, the more personal credit you have to borrow against when needed. This is credit you have complete ownership and control over. No one can take it away from you, and you determine how much credit you want to build up inside your policy.

    Because cash values are guaranteed, your personal credit and credit line is guaranteed. The risks inherent in traditional investing accounts don’t exist inside the whole life insurance policy. For some, this implication of this idea is revolutionary and refreshing. For others, it’s terrifying.

    An IBC whole life contract typically has higher early-year cash surrender value than a traditional whole life contract. The first year cash surrender value in these policies is often equal to between 60% and 80% of the first year’s premium paid. And, subsequent annual net growth of the policy’s cash value is extraordinary.

    As with all participating (dividend-paying) whole life policies, the whole life contracts used with The Infinite Banking Concept® are guaranteed insurance products. All policy values are guaranteed. In addition to the guaranteed growth rate, the participating nature of the policy means policyholders have the opportunity to earn dividends. Dividends are not guaranteed to be paid in any specific year, and are based on a combination of savings from mortality and operating expenses and gains from investment returns. If earned dividends are reinvested into the policy (i.e. used to buy additional single-premium paid-up whole life insurance), those dividends then become part of the guaranteed cash value and death benefit of the policy. This dividend enhancement also alters the trajectory of the initial guaranteed growth of the policy each and every year a dividend is paid.

    Infinite banking also involves using policy loans to buy things——sometimes consumer goods, but more often investments or valuable assets that appreciate in value. The life insurance cash value actually becomes credit for the loan. The more cash value you have in your policy, the more personal credit you have to borrow against when needed. This is credit you have complete ownership and control over. No one can take it away from you, and you determine how much credit you want to build up inside your policy.

    Because cash values are guaranteed, your personal credit and credit line is guaranteed. The risks inherent in traditional investing accounts don’t exist inside the whole life insurance policy. For some, this implication of this idea is revolutionary and refreshing. For others, it’s terrifying.

    Building, owning, and controlling one’s own personal credit is a huge responsibility. Some feel they’re not ready for it. Others are terrified by the idea that they (and they alone) will determine their own creditworthiness. And some are still hypnotized by an anticivilization that teaches them it’s wrong to have that much control over one’s own life.

    Regardless of which path one chooses, it doesn’t change the facts. Those who choose to build, own, and control their own credit through whole life insurance will have the ultimate financial advantage in life.

    A Conceptual Look at IBC Cash Value Growth

    Let’s start with a basic whole life contract as a reference point. Here’s a conceptual illustration of a guaranteed $1 million Life Paid-Up At Age 100 whole life contract on a 40-year old male, standard risk rating, non-smoker:

    Life paid up @ age 100 — $13,680 annual premium. The policy’s cash value reached $1 million by age 121 — 81 years after purchase.

    And now, that same policy designed as an IBC whole life contract (using paid-up additions):

    Custom Whole Life with Paid-Up Additions
    The same life paid up @ 100. This time, paid up additions are added so the policy reaches a guaranteed cash value of $1 million by age 71.

    Premiums in this example, are payable to age 70. In reality, premiums can be scheduled for anywhere between 5 years and out to age 100. If you want a “short-pay” whole life, you would simply schedule premiums for 5 years and stop. If you wanted to pay premiums beyond age 70, you would schedule them for however long you want to pay them. And, if you want the flexibility to stop and restart premiums at will, then you can schedule in that kind of flexibility, too (with a custom whole life contract design).

    The longest premiums can be paid is out to your age 100.

    A Life Paid-Up At Age 100 policy takes a long time to “mature”. Meaning, it takes a long time to build up $1 million of cash value in the policy — stretching the accumulation of cash value all the way out to age 121. That’s a long time to wait.

    The custom whole life contract reaches $1 million in cash value by age 71 — much sooner. To do this, it requires modifying the $1 million policy to accept more premiums than would normally be required to maintain the insurance. The focus inside the policy shifts from slowly building up $1 million over a period of 81 years to rapidly building up cash value as quickly as possible (in this example, the target age for $1 million was age 70, though with enough premium, any age can theoretically be targeted for the target cash value accumulation).

    Furthermore, because this is a dividend-paying whole life contract, dividends can add a significant amount of cash value and death benefit to the policy:

    Whole life insurance with dividend enhancement
    A custom whole life policy, with the same premium as above, and cash value that grows to $1 million by age 60 with the projected dividend enhancement.

    In this example, the $1 million savings goal is reached by age 60.

    That’s the accumulation potential of whole life insurance all by itself.

    In addition to creating your own personal credit and financing system, infinite banking helps you reach that $1 million goal even more quickly through the use of strategic borrowing and repaying of loans.

    Premium payments can be stopped while loan payments are being made, or you can continue paying premiums while repaying loans. If you stop paying premiums during a loan repayment period, cash value growth will slow down (but not stop). If you continue paying premiums while repaying loans, your cash value growth will start to accelerate towards the end of the loan term (provided you are following a strict repayment schedule that adds money back to your policy).

    If you have a custom whole life contract, with flexible premium outlays, then it’s up to you to choose how to repay loans.

    Understanding Policy Loans at a Deeper Level

    Policy loans are very different from traditional bank loans. First, there is no credit application and your loan is only limited by the amount of cash value you have available in the policy.

    Also, unlike loans from 401(k) or other retirement plans, these loans are true loans. When you borrow money from a retirement account, you are actually withdrawing money from it. When borrowing against a whole life contract, it’s a true loan against the policy itself. The cash value is what the policy is worth if you surrender it——it is equity in the policy. So, when borrowing money against it, no money ever leaves the policy. Because of this, you are effectively leveraging a conservative asset at a very low cost.

    Secondly, there is no set repayment period. You choose the terms of the repayment. You may even keep the loan open until your death. If you do, the insurer will simply deduct the loan amount from your death benefit and pay your beneficiaries the remainder. When you want to take out a loan, you simply call up the insurer or fill out a simple 1-page form. The company issues the loan, and then secures the loan amount with an equal amount of cash value from your policy.

    For example, if you have $100,000 in cash value in your policy, and you want a $10,000 loan, the insurer will give you $10,000 and then secure the loan with $10,000 from your policy. This leaves $90,000 available for future loans. As you repay the loan, your cash value is restored with each payment. What’s really special about these loans is that the insurer will continue to pay interest and dividends on the original $100,000 amount.

    Some insurers change the dividend payout by lowering or raising it on any loaned cash value, while other insurers keep the dividend the same regardless of loan activity. You’ll hear the former referred to as “direct recognition” and the latter as “non-direct recognition.” This has been the source of much confusion for consumers, who often believe that a very specific type of loan needs to be set up on their policies for this to work. The reality is, both direct and non-direct recognition loans work well for this concept.

    There’s no magic here.

    With non-direct recognition, an insurer can afford to keep the dividend the same on loaned cash value because it either raises expenses in the policy or lowers the dividend they could otherwise pay to everyone, all the time (which slightly favors people who are taking loans all the time). It’s not a big deal, but something to be aware of.

    With direct recognition, the insurer raises or lowers the dividend to reflect the fact that this money is no longer being invested by the insurer, but is instead out on loan. The policyholder’s interest payments, then, become a source of investment gain to the company, which is then fed back into the dividend pool which is repaid to the policyholder at the end of the year when a dividend is declared.

    It sounds like a lot of rigamarole, but it results in a very low-cost loan. In some cases, the loan rate can rise above the normal dividend rate, which encourages policyholders to borrow money from the insurance company and, in return, receive a higher dividend payment than they would receive without borrowing money.

    Another reason loans are sought-after by policyholders is that insurance companies allow policyholders to repay the principal of the loan before paying interest during the year. Again, this helps reduce the cost of the loan and makes it a very attractive source of funds when and if you do need to borrow money.

    How Policy Loan Amortization Works

    Not all insurance companies are “non-direct recognition” and much ado about nothing has been made about these various loan features. In truth, it doesn’t really matter whether the loan is “direct recognition” or “non-direct recognition”.

    Either way you slice it, insurance loans are a very inexpensive way to finance things (most of the time). If you pay the insurer $1 in interest, and your dividend that year is $1, you’ve effectively recovered your interest cost. That doesn’t always happen, but it can. Now, if you pay $1 in interest to the insurer, and your dividend is $0.50 the next year and $0.50 the year after that, you still recovered your interest cost but it took longer.

    Furthermore, a life insurance policy loan is the only loan I’m aware of where you can borrow money from a lender, and set up a repayment schedule to pay off the principal of the loan during the year before paying interest on the loan, thus reducing the total interest being paid to the insurance company over the life of the loan. 

    Is it possible to get a cheaper loan through a bank than though an insurer? Sure, anything is possible — it’s possible for a case of Jack Daniels to fall out of the sky and land on the roof of your house. 

    But seriously, a lot of it depends on what you give up by going to a bank and whether you’re really getting a better deal. Some insurance agents argue it’s all about the interest rate you’re paying. They’ll tell you if you can get a lower interest rate elsewhere, do it. And, while a lower rate is generally a good thing, the problem with that thinking is it’s not always obvious which is the better deal by comparing interest rates.

    For example, here is how a typical life insurance policy loan schedule looks. This loan assumes a $5,000 loan paid back over 5 years at 5% APR (click to enlarge):

    Policy loan with a 5% repayment rate.
    A policy loan illustration at 5% APR, showing the breakdown of the loan amount, principal and interest payments, adjusted for leap years.

    Here is the same loan repaid at an 12% rate (click to enlarge):

    Alternate policy loan with a 12% repayment rate.
    A policy loan illustration, showing the breakdown of the loan amount, principal and interest payments, adjusted for leap years. This time, we use a 12% repayment rate.

    The loan principal is repaid in 50 months. If the policyholder carries out the payments to the full 5 years (60 months), roughly $1,440 will be added back into the policy’s cash value. You can click on the image to see a larger view of the payment schedule.

    What this is saying is… if you normally qualify for a loan @ 12% APR (e.g. a commercial loan of some kind, a revolving line of credit, or a personal loan, or a margin loan or some other loan for investment purposes), then a loan is a lot less expensive than a conventional loan at the same rate. Not only are you paying less interest for the loan itself, money is being added directly to your policy at the end of the term (assuming you keep sending the insurance company money after the loan principal is repaid).

    This is the effect of “infinite banking” at work — adding money back to your savings versus sending that $1,440 to another lender.

    By putting that money back into your savings, you benefit yourself, you have more money available in your cash value to borrow against in the future, and you have more financial security than you did before. And… that is an ongoing process that builds over time, accelerating the build-up of that $1 million goal. 

    Interest rates are very low right now for things like mortgages. But, credit card rates and personal loans still carry a high APR. Personal loan rates vary from 4% up to over 30%, but 12% is the average. Borrowing money to invest in other businesses or to invest “on margin” is expensive. Charles Schwab currently charges an introductory margin rate of 8.325% for debit balances up to $24,999.99. The lowest rate they offer is 6.575%. So, if you borrowed money against your life insurance policy to invest, you’d want to pay at least that much to mirror the market rate for this type of loan. 

    You can repeat this process an “infinite” number of types — hence the name. With a conventional loan, you have to requalify each time you want a loan, and you are not adding money to your savings or policy cash value. You can also take on multiple loans at the same time from your policy as long as there is cash value available.

    Some Final Thoughts on Infinite Banking

    I’m not much for gimmicks — we have plenty of those in the life insurance industry. And, there is a lot of marketing around infinite banking. Most of it is terrible. I don’t know why. The concept is not new, and it doesn’t need to be embellished. Agents don’t need to lie or make up stories about how any of this works. The concept itself is really simple, and has been used for almost 200 years without too much changing. Yes, Nash put some marketing muscle behind it, and introduced some new ideas. But, there’s nothing here that should be regarded as controversial. About the only thing people argue about is whether you should do it with whole life insurance because… “whole life insurance is a scam”.

    I just don’t have the patience to entertain these kinds of phony objections anymore.

    Regardless of what you think about infinite banking, whole life insurance has helped build some of America’s most iconic businesses, and… it continues to be a core financial product for some some half-million Americans today and counting. 

    Right now, there is a bit more than half a trillion dollars sitting in whole life insurance policies at the major mutual life insurance companies. A lot of those cash values belong to high net worth individuals. Most low income and middle-class folks simply can’t afford, or choose not to buy it (with the exception of final expense insurance). The lower a person’s income is, the more they tend to rely on high-risk investment strategies for the bulk of their savings. Higher income folks, and individuals with a lot of savings and assets, tend to gravitate to lower risk products for a substantial portion of their investment portfolio, like… dividend-paying whole life insurance. And, the more money they have, the more they have to lose, the more they tend to favor guaranteed insurance products.

    Anyway, there’s a lot of money flowing into the big mutuals. And, that doesn’t count the smaller mutual insurers and the stock companies selling other types of cash value life insurance. And, at least for whole life policies, each year that dollar figure grows at a guaranteed rate. And, as people die, and death benefits are paid out, more insurance is bought, which pushes the dollar amounts even higher. The momentum at this point is, I believe, unstoppable.

    The Infinite Banking Concept® is not a strategy that everyone will find appealing. But, for some… it may be exactly what they need to feel more secure about their own financial future.

    Whole life insurance is not going away. On the contrary, it’s seeing a resurgence.

    Legal Disclaimer: The Infinite Banking Concept® is a registered trademark of Infinite Banking Concepts, LLC. Monegenix® and David Lewis are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Infinite Banking Concepts, LLC.

  • Permanent Life Insurance And Some Pros and Cons

    I hate writing this post because it almost feels too basic. I always thought you could easily find similar information elsewhere on the Internet if you really want to. But, I’ve fielded enough questions about it that I finally decided to write my own thoughts on just the very basic basics about permanent life insurance. Plus, once I took the time to take an honest at what other people are writing about on this topic…

    Yeesh.

    It’s freakin’ insane.

    So, here’s my thoughts in a somewhat structured manner…

    What is permanent life insurance?

    Before I get too far, I want to make sure you and I are on the same page about what it is, and how it works… you know… so there’s no confusion.

    Permanent life insurance is a type of life insurance policy that’s designed to be held—wait for it—permanently. As in, for your entire life. The most basic permanent life insurance policy is called “whole life insurance”. A more complex variation of permanent life insurance is “universal life insurance”. That’s pretty much it, though you’re going to see iterations on both (“indexed UL”, “variable UL”, etc. and so forth).

    Both types of permanent life insurance can build cash value, which represents the current value of the policy’s death benefit, though not all universal life policies build cash value (confusing, I know).

    How does permanent life insurance work?

    It’s very simple:

    1. Premiums are paid to the life insurance company.
    2. Expenses are deducted from the current premium + any existing cash value to support the death benefit and operations of the company.
    3. The remainder is credited with interest.

    Aaaaaaaaaand, that’s it.

    As long as the policy has cash value, the policy stays in force. If the cash value ever drops to $0, the policy lapses (terminates).

    Everything else is (kinda-sorta) a dog and pony show.

    Now, there are some quirks and nuances built into some life insurance policies. For example, Guaranteed Universal Life (GUL) is a type of universal life insurance that doesn’t build cash value. Instead, the insurance company keeps whatever cash value the policy would have generated, builds a capital reserve for the policy, and guarantees the death benefit regardless of what happens to the implied cash value. Even if the cash value would have gone to $0, the insurance company keeps the policy in force for you as long as all required premiums are paid on time.

    Whole life insurance and most forms of universal life insurance build cash value you can either withdraw or borrow against (sort of like a home equity line of credit). The borrowing function of permanent life insurance adds some amount complexity to the policy, but not much.

    The loan works like a standard line of credit (LOC), except that interest accrues daily on the outstanding principal amount and payments made on policy loans throughout the year go to reduce the principal of the loan first before interest is paid.

    In some cases, the interest credits for the policy are matched to the interest on loans, effectively canceling each other out. In other cases, there’s a small spread in either direction, resulting in a net low-cost loan or loan arbitrage.

    Permanent life insurance vs. term life insurance

    The major difference between permanent life insurance and term life insurance is the cash value and premiums used to support the policy in a permanent policy. Since term life insurance has no cash value (well, it does have a cash reserve, but it’s on the insurer’s books —they keep it and it’s never part of the policy you buy so you never see it), and is designed to be in force for a much shorter period of time, it has much lower premium payments. The premiums are used to support the policy in a more direct way. Missed premiums on term insurance will cause the policy to lapse. Missed payments on permanent life insurance won’t necessarily cause the policy to lapse because most policies include either an automatic premium loan option (APL), which will use the existing cash value to make the premium payment (whole life), or the policy automatically has expenses deducted from the cash value (UL). Permanent life insurance policies also have other important and substantial long-term benefits that term policies don’t.

    Kinda makes sense if you think about it. You get less from term insurance, so you pay less. Whole life insurance has higher premiums, but you get a lot more value from the policy.

    Cost of permanent life insurance vs term life insurance

    What policyholders tend to like about term life insurance is the fact that you can temporarily buy lots of death benefit from the insurance company for a very low premium. A $1 million 30-year term life policy on a 45 year old male, non-smoker, with a standard risk rating might have a premium of $3,308.69/yr (Source: Banner Life Insurance Company, valid as of April 2024).

    The same $1 million of whole life insurance might have a premium of $23,430/yr (Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, whole life 121, valid as of April 2024) or $18,550 (Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company, valid April 2024).

    Even on the lower end of things, the whole life premium is 5.6 times higher than the term premium. Easy to see why a lot of people choose term insurance.

    However, to get at the true cost of the whole life insurance, you need to strip out the cash value from the policy, and see what portion of the premium is going to support the cost of the death benefit. With term insurance, this is theoretically simple to understand. A lot of the premium (if not all) should be going to support the death benefit. It doesn’t work exactly this way in practice, but it’s close enough.

    With whole life insurance, you have to employ a little bit of algebra to get at the answer, but it can be done. I go into more detail about the cost of whole life and term insurance, and how to calculate the true costs of both, in my other post titled, The Cost Of Whole Life Insurance Vs. Buy Term And Invest The Difference.

    Types of permanent life insurance policies

    There are essentially 5 different types of permanent life insurance being sold in the U.S. today:

    1. Whole life insurance
    2. Current assumption universal life insurance
    3. Guaranteed universal life insurance
    4. Variable universal life insurance
    5. Indexed universal life insurance

    Whole life insurance

    Whole life has 3 things that other permanent policies don’t have:

    1. Guaranteed level premiums
    2. Guaranteed cash values
    3. Guaranteed death benefit

    These guarantees create a very stable life insurance structure, and in fact gives whole life a structural advantage over other forms of permanent life insurance. There are no assumptions about what the policy will do.

    Participating policies (dividend-paying) also include the option for higher cash values and death benefits from non-guaranteed dividend payments. Each year, the insurance company will determine how much it can afford to pay policyholders back as a dividend. The amount can (and does) change each year, and depends entirely on the company’s annual performance. Once the dividend is paid, the policyholder can choose to receive the amount in cash, keep it on account with the insurance company, use it to reduce the premium payment, or use it to buy additional paid-up life insurance. If the dividend is used to buy paid-up life insurance, it becomes part of the guaranteed cash value and can’t be lost.

    Whole life is a staple product that has traditionally performed well over long periods of time. It’s also a perennial bestseller for the large old mutual life insurers.

    Current assumption universal life insurance

    Current assumption ULs (CAUL) were very popular during the 1980s. Agents took advantage of the low rates of the 1970s by replacing underperforming whole life policies (mostly non-participating) with universal life policies paying double-digit crediting rates.

    When I first started in the life insurance biz back in 2004, I serviced a lot of these older UL policies and saw many of the assumptions made when the policy was sold. Back then, there was an old saying, “Pay three and you’re free” or “Pay for, and no more”. Meaning, the interest credits of the UL policy were supposed to be so high, you could make 3 or 4 annual premiums and then quit forever.

    It didn’t work.

    Reason being, universal life is entirely driven by assumptions, with what I’d call “technical guarantees” backing up the policy. ULs do have a minimum guaranteed crediting rate, and maximum guaranteed policy charges, but there’s no guaranteed net cash value or death benefit. And, when you throttle the policy to hit the minimum crediting rate and maximum charges, it nearly always causes the policy to crash and burn.

    Guaranteed universal life insurance (GUL)

    GUL was created in response to the failure of CAUL to deliver on its initial soft promise of a higher performing permanent life insurance policy. A lot of the older current assumption ULs lapsed due to interest rates (and thus policy crediting rates) falling in the 1990s and early 2000s. Lots of policyholders got that infamous letter in the mail telling them they’d need to either lower the death benefit of their policy or… dramatically increase their premium payments. In some cases, they were told they had to do both or the policy would lapse.

    Naturally, policyholders were a teeny tiny bit upset about that.

    And so… life insurers came up with the brilliant idea of a guaranteed death benefit UL policy.

    The catch?

    There’s no cash value component (or if there are cash values, they’re minimal).

    GULs have a level guaranteed death benefit and guaranteed level premiums. As long as the premiums are paid on time, the policy stays in force and is guaranteed to never lapse. If premiums are paid too early or too late, it can negatively affect the no-lapse guarantee provision. Sometimes, it destroys the guarantee.

    On paper, GUL solved the problem of losing a death benefit due to lapse. All the sudden, interest rates and cash values didn’t matter.

    Variable universal life insurance

    Variable universal life (VUL) was created on the back of current assumption UL, and was geared towards policyholders who still wanted an accumulation-driven life insurance policy, but without being tied to falling interest rates. The idea being, if policyholders couldn’t get policy performance from high yielding bonds, they could get it from the stock market instead.

    VUL allows policyholders to allocate their cash value to “subaccounts”, which look, feel, and act just like standard equity mutual funds, except they exist only inside a life insurance policy. Owning mutual funds inside an insurance wrapper allows policyholders to tie the performance of their policy to the stock market, which works well when the stock market is doing well and not so well when the stock market crashes.

    VUL worked well in the 1990s when the market was on a seemingly never-ending bull run. Then, it kinda fell out of favor in the late ’90s and early 2000s. It saw a mild resurgence after 2008, and seems to be seeing somewhat of a revival today.

    Indexed universal life insurance

    Indexed universal life was created on the back of the variable ULs of the 90s.

    This type of UL promises “upside potential without downside risk”—a perfect antidote for the late 90s and early 2000s (and especially 2008). Policyholders receive interest credits based on the upward movement of a stock market index, without having to invest directly in the index.

    Magic?

    Not really. Insurers take the premiums and invest them in high quality bonds. Then, siphon some of the interest off the bonds to buy index call options on the S&P 500 or some other popular equity index. The insurer uses call spreads—buying an “at the money” (ATM) call option and simultaneously selling a slightly “out of the money” (OTM) call option—to support a cap rate (or participation rate) for the policy. In some cases, there’s no cap. Instead, the insurer uses a spread (fee) to support “uncapped” index growth.

    Whatever the case, the cap/par rate is the maximum amount of money the insurer can credit to the policyholder’s cash value account. For uncapped indexing, the insurer subtracts the fee before crediting the remainder to the policyholder’s cash value.

    If the strategy flops, then the policyholder gets a big fat goose egg, but doesn’t lose money (not from the index, anyway). This is the “downside protection” of the policy. Cost of insurance (COI) and other policy charges are still deducted, though. So, it’s possible to have a zero credit year and still lose money due to charges coming out. In fact, this situation is almost inevitable at some point.

    Understanding the cash value of permanent life insurance

    Thanks to financial gurus spreading their confusions via social media, there’s a huge misunderstanding about what the cash value of a permanent life insurance policy is.

    Cash value is the net present value of the future death benefit. In other words, it’s what the death benefit is worth, right now. And, in the future, that cash value will equal the death benefit, which is called “endowment”.

    Imagine buying some item at a discount, and in the future it will be worth more. This is what the cash value is relative to the death benefit.

    That’s all it is.

    Over the years, there’s been lots of confusion about whether the insurance company steals your cash value when you die. This is nonsensical gibberish. The cash value is money set aside to pay for the future death benefit. The death benefit itself is really a combination of current cash value and pure insurance (the difference between the cash value and death benefit is called “net amount at risk”).

    There’s nothing for the insurance company to “steal”. You get exactly what the insurance company promises in the contract.

    Advantages and disadvantages of permanent life insurance

    Advantages

    • Guaranteed level premiums (whole life insurance and guaranteed universal life insurance)
    • Guaranteed lifetime death benefit (whole life insurance and guaranteed universal life insurance)
    • Guaranteed cash value growth (whole life insurance)
    • Return on cash value similar to high-quality bond fund
    • Whole life dividends can significantly add to the guaranteed rate; universal life crediting rates, caps, and participation rates might increase substantially—you might earn significantly more than originally illustrated
    • Liquidity similar to money market fund
    • Option to invest in equities (variable life insurance)
    • Upside potential with downside risk protection (indexed universal life)
    • Tax-free buildup inside the policy
    • Tax-deferred or tax-free access to cash values via partial surrenders and policy loans—Borrow against the cash value of the policy for major expenses
    • Policy loans are tax-free, generally low-cost, and offset by interest credits from the issuing insurance company
    • Option for accelerated death benefits riders
    • Premiums waived when disabled (with disability waiver of premium rider)
    • Option to buy additional paid-up life insurance without underwriting (whole life insurance)
    • Option to transfer who is insured under the policy (certain whole life and universal life policies)
    • Optional guaranteed purchase option allows future insurance purchases without evidence of insurability
    • Ability to protect pension payments for spouse (“pension max”)
    • Cash values can be used to supplement retirement income (“LIRP”)
    • Cost of whole life insurance is lower than term insurance if held to maturity/endowment—20 and 30-year cost might be lower than term insurance if the policy is a high cash value policy
    • No volatility in cash values allows policyholders to take more risk in investments, can offset investment losses and be used to buffer volatility in investments
    • Whole life insurance is a simple and straightforward product design, structurally stable
    • Major mutual carriers that issue whole life insurance have a 100+ year history of paying dividends, and all of them have excellent financial ratings
    • Provides liquidity at death—the death benefit is immediately transferred to heirs, bypassing probate
    • Provides asset protection in some states—certain state laws prohibit creditors from taking the cash value and death benefit to satisfy a debt
    • Can avoid estate taxes if placed in an irrevocable life insurance trust (ILIT)
    • Can provide financial security for a disabled dependent if you yourself will never be financially independent
    • Can be used to fund “key man” insurance plans, executive bonus plans, and buy-sell agreements

    Disadvantages

    • More complex than term life insurance
    • Higher premiums than term insurance
    • High fixed expenses in the early years of the policy (retail whole life and universal life)
    • Can be more expensive than term if the policy lapses in the early years
    • Limited liquidity in the first 3-7 years of most policies—you might not “break even” until years 7-15
    • No “wiggle room” in premium payments
    • Expected returns are lower than equities
    • Policy loan interest compounds annually if not paid, and can eventually cause the policy to lapse
    • Policy loans and withdrawals might negatively affect the policy’s death benefits—unpaid policy loans reduce the net death benefit paid to beneficiaries at death
    • Some supplemental term riders added to whole life and universal life policies can potentially become prohibitively expensive to the point of causing negative returns on cash value over the long-term
    • Policies can potentially become a modified endowment contract (MEC) if too much premium is paid in any given year or significant material changes are made to the policy via changes to the death benefit, partial surrenders, or policy loans
    • Mutual insurance companies can demutualize and nuke the dividend; stock companies can sell off unprofitable lines of business to another company that will lower crediting rates and raise policy expenses
    • Universal life insurance has built-in “levers” allowing the insurance company to increase expenses and decrease crediting rates
    • Mutual insurers can lower dividends based on negative company performance—you might get far less than what was originally illustrated

    When should you buy permanent life insurance?

    Until or unless medical science gives you complete control over biological aging, assume you’re going to die at some point. That being the case, life insurance can be appropriate for anyone at any age. But, not everyone values the coverage, and that’s what it really boils down to. Plus, let’s face it: premiums are relatively expensive compared to not buying insurance. If you’re single, struggling, and your primary financial concern right now is being able to pay the rent, maybe life insurance doesn’t make a heck of a lot of sense to you. If you have a family, but not much extra money laying around at the end of the month, probably term insurance is the way to go. If you have lots of assets, and you want to protect those assets while you’re alive, possibly use them in a very tax-advantaged way, do some cool things that involve policy loans and personal credit, and then transfer those assets in a simple and tax-advantaged way, permanent life insurance is the simplest (and possibly the best) way to do it.

    Obviously, buying permanent insurance is a lot more planning-intensive. People with something to lose tend to want life insurance. People who don’t, usually don’t care.

    Some will argue the step-up in basis at death makes permanent life insurance policies unnecessary but, as with any tax favors, the IRS can and does change the rules. Rev. Rul. 2023-2 now disallows the step-up in basis at death when assets are placed into an irrevocable trust. To get the step-up basis, assets must be in a person’s taxable estate. Of course, this opens them up to estate (and other) taxes. Of course, if a person’s estate is small, it might not be a big deal. But this also assumes you won’t be liquidating those assets before death and that your heirs won’t want to liquidate them either. Plenty of times when a parent has left a house to their kids, for example, and they want nothing to do with it—they just want to sell it. They’ll pay a bunch of taxes on it. If you care enough to leave them something, the life insurance can either pay the taxes for them or eliminate the burden of taxes altogether for liquid assets if using an irrevocable life insurance trust.

    Either way, permanent life insurance is a simple way to pass wealth onto the next generation, while still benefiting from it (in the form of cash value) while you’re still alive.

  • Top 5 Best Dividend Paying Whole Life Insurance Companies for Maximum Cash Value Growth

    There are a little over 700 life insurance companies in the U.S. as of 2025. Of those, about 100 of them are mutual life insurance companies—companies that build and sell dividend-paying whole life insurance. Of those, the best dividend-paying whole life insurance companies can be boiled down to about 5 or maybe 6 of those 100. By “best”, I mean cash value accumulation.

    Whole life is easily divided into:

    1) Final expense/death benefit focused insurance, and;

    2) Accumulation-focused whole life.

    … and the accumulation-focused whole life insurance space is really, really, small.

    Yeah… really.

    Here’s a shortlist of the top 5 carriers.

    Summary: The Top 5 Dividend-Paying Whole Life Insurance Companies

    The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company of Milwaukee (NML)

    Some say “The Gold Standard” for what whole life insurance is and ought to be. I dunno about that, but the company does have a cult-like following. NML is the rule-following sibling of “The Big 4” mutuals, and the model of what a mutual company is and ought to be in terms of GIA management, product pricing, and dividend sharing. Their total whole life dividends dwarf every other insurer in this list by a wide margin. At the same time, they’re largely a black box unless you’re a career agent for the company. Meaning, only Northwestern Mutual agents can illustrate and sell you one of NML’s products. I’ve seen many Northwestern Mutual whole life insurance products. They all feel very similar. Many of them are a combination of base whole life insurance and a term rider. Some are base + a PUA option. Regardless, NML products aren’t the highest cash value products on the market, and from what I’ve seen, their premium and PUA flexibility is essentially non-existent, but the products themselves do very well if you hold them for several decades, all things considered. If you have an older NML product, keep it. You probably won’t get anything like it ever again.

    The New York Life Insurance Company of New York (NYL)

    In some ways, New York Life acts like Northwestern Mutual’s rebellious younger brother (even though they are actually the oldest mutual carrier in the U.S., but… whatever). They have a strong whole life product line and the dividends to match. But it’s the only company I’ve ever worked with that has minimum premium requirements for some of its whole life products. Thankfully, not all of its products have minimum premium requirements. NYL has a great participating whole life product (two of them, actually) with excellent term blending options and —in spite of what critics claim— has one of the most flexible PUA riders I’ve ever seen on a whole life chassis. Cash value growth on their new product line is very good, and is finally (FINALLY) competitive with Penn Mutual, MassMutual, and The Guardian. One of the more interesting quirks about their products is the very generous and flexible chronic illness rider. NYL also has an excellent convertible term policy which basically allows policyholders to do “super back-dating” to the original purchase age when converting to whole life — something they don’t talk about a lot, but which is an amazingly generous option for a term product. No other company allows this.

    The Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company Of Springfield (“MassMutual”)

    A mutual company with a rich, and long, history of paying life insurance dividends. Solid whole life insurance product portfolio, with some innovative long-term care options. MassMutual has a more “corporate feel” than the other insurers, and the products themselves are more rigid in terms of what can be done with them (e.g. not a lot of flexibility in the PUA rider premiums). More flexible than NML and NYL, but still pretty stiff. They do offer a term blending option, but again… not very flexible. No free living benefits rider, either. Lots of product options, however, including a special high early-year cash value product which no other company has.

    The Guardian Life Insurance Company Of America (“The Guardian”)

    The baby of the old mutuals, with a long history of paying whole life insurance dividends. They’re unique among the old mutuals in that they have a diverse whole life product offering. Basically, if there’s a problem that can be solved with whole life insurance, Guardian has a purpose-built whole life product to solve that problem. Seriously. I’ve never seen a company with so many different whole life offerings. It’s a little disorienting.

    Dividend option Q is Guardian’s term blend, which can be added to many of its whole life insurance products (notably, its Whole Life 95 and Whole Life 99 products). Option Q makes a lot of high cash value growth cases possible with this company that would otherwise be non-starters. It also has a lesser-used dividend option R for increasing death benefit, and an “index participation feature” (IPF) which pays dividend credits based on the upward movement of the S&P500 index. Guardian is one of the few carriers in this list that allows policyholders to choose whether they want a direct or non-direct recognition loan option on their policies. The company also has some interesting and unadvertised dividend benefits, like “pegging & substitution” to help new policyholders get more dividends in the early years of the policy when current dividend rates are falling. Finally, Guardian has a PUA rider that is nearly as flexible as New York Life’s, albeit with slightly higher annual minimums.

    The Pennsylvania Mutual Life Insurance Company of Philadelphia (“Penn Mutual”)

    Penn Mutual is sometimes called Guardian’s little brother, and decidedly the smallest of the old mutuals. Don’t let that fool you, though. They’ve been paying dividends for over 175 consecutive years and is the second-oldest mutual company in this list.

    They have one of the most flexible products in the marketplace — a fully customizable whole life insurance product with high cash value growth in the mid to late part of the contract. Good if you plan on holding the policy for 15+ years. Their term blend is called the “flexible protection rider”, and is essentially a low-cost life insurance rider mated to a PUA rider. Each payment into the rider reduces the term portion and increases the permanent paid-up life insurance portion. As the term decreases, the paid-up additions increase, acting almost like “convertible term on autopilot”. Unlike other carriers, Penn forces the pay down of the term portion of their term blend rider and limits the term blending to prevent policyholders from going off the rails. Their PUA rider is also very flexible, and has very generous terms second only to NYL and Guardian. Policy performance tends to be at, or near, the top of all carriers in this space.

    The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company Of Milwaukee (NML) 

    Best For Low Net Cost And Overall Pricing

    Northwestern Mutual (logo)

    Northwestern Mutual Financial Overview

    Capitalization Ratio: 13.80%

    Comdex: 100

    A.M. Best Company: A++

    Fitch Ratings: AAA

    Moody’s Investors Service: Aaa

    S&P Global Ratings: AA+

    30-year DIR Average: 6.85%

    Pros and Cons Of Northwestern Mutual

    Pros

    • The highest total dividend payout of all the mutuals
    • Direct recognition
    • Great customer service

    Cons

    • Policies can be very rigid with limited customizability
    • Closed ecosystem frustrates some policyholders

    Northwestern Mutual has long been considered the gold standard for what whole life insurance ought to be. The company’s primary focus is not cash accumulation, but its products have historically been used for that and have performed very well. 

    Northwestern Mutual is the most “old school” of the mutuals, but also the largest (by far) in terms of dividend payments (but, oddly enough, not total assets) and has a very strong company culture oriented around its flagship whole life products. Compared with other mutual carriers, NML seems more focused on achieving the lowest net cost for whole life insurance rather than touting high return on cash value.

    Also, this is the only mutual in the group where you must buy the policy direct from an employee of the company. Northwestern Mutual doesn’t have an independent field force. Every agent works for Northwestern Mutual. That can potentially be a good thing, but it can also limit your options. For example, if you want to get an independent review of your policy, you can’t. Everything in Northwestern’s portfolio is proprietary. You’re also not going to see quotes from multiple different companies working with a Northwestern Mutual agent.

    And, if you ask, the agent is likely to tell you Northwestern Mutual is the best life insurance company that’s ever existed in the history of insurance companies.

    To be fair, they do have excellent customer service ratings. The company’s financial statements are clean as a whistle, and as a result… their products are really, really, good and tend to perform very well over the long-term.

    PUA Limits

    Their PUA rider is called “the additional premium rider”.

    In year 1, the PUA cap is the greater of 7x the Whole Life Plus premium, $100,000, or the Whole Life Plus MEC limit. In years 2+, it’s the greater of 2x the Whole Life Plus 100 premium, $10,000, or the Whole Life Plus MEC limit. Any reductions in the PUA rider become permanent, so there’s no real flexibility there. And, you can’t add more than the scheduled amount without additional underwriting. And, unlike most of the other PUA riders from other companies, Northwestern Mutual requires you to pay PUA premiums with the same mode as the base whole life premium.

    If you’re looking for high cash accumulation from this company, go with the Adjustable CompLife and buy as much paid up additional insurance as you can.

    The New York Life Insurance Company Of New York (NYL) 

    Best For Customizable Payment Options And Non-Direct Recognition

    New York Life (logo)

    New York Life Financial Overview

    Capitalization Ratio: 14.0%

    Comdex: 100

    A.M. Best Company: A++

    Fitch Ratings: AAA

    Moody’s Investors Service: Aaa

    S&P Global Ratings: AA+

    30-year DIR Average: 6.74%

    Pros and Cons Of New York Life

    Pros

    • “Dial in” payments to create custom payment length up to age 75 for their “custom whole life” product
    • Non direct recognition company
    • Very flexible PUA rider with $10 monthly or $120 annual minimum PUA rider requirement, and high PUA rider maximum annual payment limit based on a multiple of the non-rated base policy premium
    • A dividend option term (DOT) rider for extensive customization and term blending options

    Cons

    • High minimum premium requirements for the Secure Wealth Plus whole life product makes it difficult for some to get into their top tier product line
    • A short list of additional riders for all their whole life products

    New York Life is, in some ways, like Northwestern Mutual, except older and a little bit more aggressive with some of its product offerings.

    While they do things very differently from NML in terms of product design, their whole life insurance products are some of the strongest performing in the industry, cash accumulation-wise. It didn’t always used to be this way, though. Back in 2018, NYL’s flagship whole life insurance product was essentially the laggard of the bunch. Both guaranteed cash and non-guaranteed performance lagged Guardian (and Guardian was already known as something of a laggard back then). 

    But, just like all the other mutuals, New York Life repriced their products, and now has one of the strongest-performing whole life policies in the marketplace. They also offer some of the most generous term conversion privileges I’ve ever seen in the marketplace, allowing policyholders to essentially convert a term policy to whole life using “original age”. Meaning, a policyholder could theoretically buy a term policy at age 35, convert at age 45, and get whole life pricing based on the original age of 35.

    Their new Secure Wealth Plus is an attempt to compete with MassMutual and Guardian in the high cash value 10-pay whole life space, and is a nod to “infinite banking” with their “Bank On Whole Life” (BOWL) marketing concept. Truthfully, all their whole life products can be designed for high cash value accumulation with their dividend option term (DOT) and “Option to Purchase Paid-Up Additions” rider (OPP). 

    The company’s OPP rider allows for maximum paid-up additional insurance based on the base premium, which then scales down over time. Even with the sliding scale, there is incredible flexibility in the OPP rider. And, as long as you pay at least $120 per year into it, you never lose the ability to fund the rider to the maximum annual payment limit.

    PUA Limits

    In the first year, your OPP rider cap is 10x the Annual Standard Base Premium (ASBP). In year 2, it’s 8x the base premium. In year 3, it’s 6x the base premium. In year 4, it’s 4x the base premium. In year 5+, it’s 2x the base premium. This is based on current company practice, which could theoretically change over time. NYL does guarantee the OPP rider cap will never be less than 1x the base premium. 

    The minimum OPP rider payment requirement is $10/month or $120/year in any given year, but if the policyholder pays nothing by the 2nd policy anniversary or if OPP rider payments are skipped for 3 consecutive policy anniversaries, the rider is dropped from the policy. Finally, there’s a household lifetime maximum on paid-up additions of $10 million.

    Overall, New York Life offers a very solid product—very competitive when compared against other carriers in this list.

    The Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company Of Springfield (“MassMutual”) 

    Best For High Early-Year Cash Values And Non-Direct Recognition

    MassMutual (Logo)

    MassMutual Financial Overview

    Capitalization Ratio: 13.40%

    Comdex: 98

    A.M. Best Company: A++

    Fitch Ratings: AA+

    Moody’s Investors Service: Aa3

    S&P Global Ratings: AA+

    30-year DIR Average: 7.40%

    Pros and Cons Of MassMutual

    Pros

    • Both non-direct and direct recognition policy loans
    • Simple term-blending option
    • Simple and intuitive online self-service via the MassMutual app

    Cons

    • Somewhat rigid policy designs
    • Customizability is somewhat limited
    • Most policy changes (including changes to term blending and PUA riders) only allowed once per year
    • Openly discourages agents and policyholders from using their products for concepts like IBC

    MassMutual has a decidedly more “corporate feel” than most of the other mutual insurers in the group, but they’re very much a policyholder-friendly mutual carrier and one of the best whole life companies out there.

    The company’s High Early Cash Value product (Legacy HEVC) is unique among its mutual brethren in that it’s specifically designed for high early year cash values. We’re talking 85% to 95% cash value as a percentage of premium paid in the first year. The low early-year expenses means you get cash value almost equal to your cost basis in year 1 of the policy. 

    This policy was designed more for businesses that need to show total cash value in the early years of the policy that is higher than a typical whole life policy. Normally, this is for accounting purposes or some special use cases where showing additional cash value on paper is an advantage to the business. If your accounting and finance guys are giddy over showing lower impact on the balance sheet, this product is going to look very appealing to them. 

    But there are no free lunches. 

    The tradeoff is… expenses are spread out over the life of the policy (instead of being heaped, which is how the company can offer the high early-year cash value). Because of this, you actually end up depressing long-term cash value. The longer you hold the HECV product, the more this becomes apparent. So, while you get additional cash value in the first few years than you otherwise would get, you pay for it later with lower total cash value. 

    MassMutual’s long-term cash-focused product is the Legacy 100 with the Life Insurance Supplemental Rider (LISR). The LISR is a sort of term + paid-up additions rider. The way it works is, the annual dividend plus the LISR premium buys a target face amount of insurance. Over time, the non-guaranteed dividends help buy permanent paid-up additional life insurance, which replaces the term insurance, and keeps the target face amount level until all the term insurance is gone. Couple the LISR with MassMutual’s other paid-up additions rider, the Additional Life Insurance Rider (ALIR), and the product can produce some amazing cash values. 

    The downside to MassMutual’s design is actually the LISR itself. The way MassMutual does the conversion makes the rider highly sensitive to changes in the dividend. As dividend rates go down, the recommended (and eventually, the required) LISR premium rises, sometimes substantially. This is because dividends are a major driver of LISR-to-PUA conversion. And because MassMutual allows you to thin fund the LISR, policyholders can get a nasty surprise later on down the road if dividends don’t work out as expected.

    Another thing with the LISR and ALIR is they can only be changed once per year. Meaning, if you want to lower or raise your LISR or ALIR payment, you can only do so on your policy anniversary.

    PUA Limits

    The LISR minimum premium is $0 and the maximum premium is whatever is necessary to convert all the term insurance to paid up additions. Minimum premium for ALIR is $0, but if you lower your ALIR payments for 3 consecutive years, the company will change the maximum ALIR premium to whatever amount was the highest amount paid during those 3 years.

    The hard limits for MassMutual’s PUA riders are 10x base premium all years, with a $5 million annual limit for non 1035 exchanges. It’s 20x base premium for 1035 exchanges with a $3M annual premium limit.

    This makes MassMutual’s policies some of the more rigid ones in the list—not too much flexibility in premium payments.

    Even so, if you don’t mind the rigidity of MassMutual’s product line, these products have amazing growth potential.

    One last thing here is MassMutual has done an amazing job with it’s policyholder app. The app lets you log into your account, initiate policy loans, policy loan repayments, change premium payments, submit policy changes (e.g. change of beneficiary), and more right from the app. This is a huge time-saver, especially if you don’t like talking to customer service agents.

    The Guardian Life Insurance Company Of America (“The Guardian”)

    Best for Diverse Selection Of Whole Life Products, Policy Customization, and Premium Flexibility

    The Guardian Life Insurance Company Of America (Logo)

    Guardian Financial Overview

    Capitalization Ratio: 14.40%

    Comdex: 99

    A.M. Best Company: A++

    Fitch Ratings: AA+ (Withdrawn for commercial reasons)

    Moody’s Investors Service: Aa1

    S&P Global Ratings: AA+

    30-year DIR Average: 7.02%

    Pros and Cons Of Guardian

    Pros

    • Wide range of policy options and riders, including an optional chronic illness rider and LTC rider
    • Unique index participation feature (equity indexing) not found on most whole life products
    • Low minimum face amounts for smaller policies
    • Non-direct and direct recognition policy loans
    • Coverage for adverse risk (i.e. people who normally wouldn’t qualify for insurance)
    • One of the more flexible PUA riders in the industry, with low minimums, high maximums, flexible payment frequency, and the ability to pay both scheduled and unscheduled PUA payments
    • Simple and intuitive online/self-service options through the Guardian app
    • Embraces a variety of insurance concepts from LEAP, Living Balance Sheet, and IBC

    Cons

    • Might be overwhelming for those who prefer simple policy options
    • PUA maximums decrease over time
    • Some policy options can be expensive compared to other insurance companies

    Guardian is an interesting company. It seems to have a whole life product for every scenario.

    You want high death benefit? There’s a whole life insurance product specifically tailored for that. Want high early year cash value and a high 10th-year cash value? Use their whole life 95 product. Want the best long-term cash value performance? Choose the whole life 99. Want something geared towards high guaranteed cash value? Use whole life 121. Need a policy but not sure you qualify for life insurance? No problem. They have guaranteed-issue whole life. They even have basic whole life policies with very small face amounts and limited-pay whole life products which are paid up at specific ages or after a specific number of years if you are worried about your ability to pay premiums forever. Want to trade your whole dividend payments for an equity-indexing option? Guardian offers that, too.

    They even have whole life policies specifically designed to be used for executive bonus plans and pension trusts.

    In all, Guardian offers a choice of 12 different whole life products. And, Guardian is known for constantly tweaking its product lineup and product features. Their product devs remind me of “the boys in the back room”—mad scientists always tinkering with stuff, but never finished. 

    In some ways, that’s good. It means they’re actively developing and constantly improving their products. Much better that than let everything go stale. Sometimes their tweaks leave something to be desired, however, which is why I haven’t always promoted them to my clients. 

    Another deterrent for me was, in the past, their minimum face amounts were too high, and they seemed to be a more expensive option compared to some of the other mutuals. But, they’ve recently repriced everything, and are now one of the best dividend paying whole life insurance companies out there.

    If you’re looking for blended whole life or policies that work well with infinite banking, then you’ll want to check out the company’s dividend option Q (level term rider) and add generous paid-up additions rider premium payments. But, even without the term blending, Guardian’s products perform very well and, in some cases, work better than the blended option.

    Speaking of PUA payments, Guardian has a very generous PUA rider for the 2021-2022 series (the current series as of (2025).

    PUA Limits

    The minimum requirement to keep the rider active is $250 per year. In the first year, the PUA cap is set to the lesser of 3x the base premium or $2 million. You can also apply for unlimited excess PUA payments in the first year of the policy. In years 2-10, the PUA cap is 3x the base premium up to $2 million. In year’s 11+, the annual PUA cap is 1x the base premium, up to a $2 million maximum. 

    If you elected dividend option Q/R, the maximum annual PUA cap is 10x the annual non-rated base policy premium or $2,000,000 and can be paid at any time during the year until the face amount of the one-year term is reduced to $0.

    For all guaranteed issue whole life products, Guardian caps the PUA payments at the lesser of $2 million or 1x the non-rated base premium.

    Like many other companies these days, their customer service can be hit or miss. Thankfully, Guardian has an excellent self-service option via the Guardian app, which is simple and intuitive to use.

    The Pennsylvania Mutual Life Insurance Company Of Philadelphia (“Penn Mutual”)

    Best for Premium Flexibility and Policy Customizability

    Penn Mutual (logo)

    Penn Mutual Financial Overview

    Capitalization Ratio: 17.50%

    Comdex: 94

    A.M. Best Company: A+

    Fitch Ratings: AA-

    Moody’s Investors Service: Aa3

    S&P Global Ratings: A+

    30-year DIR Average: 6.72%

    Pros and Cons Of Penn Mutual

    Pros

    • Flexible PUA rider and payment frequency options, with the ability to pay unscheduled PUA premiums in excess of the regularly-scheduled amount.
    • Direct recognition policy loans
    • Rare overloan protection rider and chronic illness rider on whole life product
    • Low minimum face amounts for smaller policies
    • Embraces insurance concepts like IBC, LEAP, and other similar concepts

    Cons

    • Customer service could use some improvement
    • PUA minimums are higher than other life insurers
    • Online portals and self-service options need improvement

    The company’s dividend-paying whole life insurance product is customizable to the point where you can “dial in” the number of premiums you want to pay and load your policy with an impressive amount of paid up additions. 

    The company also offers a choice of 2 different paid-up additions (PUA) riders. Its term blending is what helps build large cash values in the product and it works a bit differently than some of the other company’s blending options. First of all, the term rider is mated with paid-up additions, such that each premium payment decreases the one-year term insurance amount.

    Combined, they called it the “flexible protection rider” (FPR), and it’s the secret sauce behind squeezing out more cash value from their whole life insurance product.

    A common problem with supplemental term riders and term blends is the term portion of the policy can cause the whole thing to implode if the term costs get out of hand. Sometimes, these kinds of riders are dependent on dividend payments from the company and if dividends are less than illustrated, you might have to kick up more premiums to keep things working smoothly.

    For the most part, that’s not true with Penn. If you illustrate a “no dividend” scenario in their software, you can “jimmy” the product so that the term rider never causes any other systemic problems. Then, under the normal dividend scenario, the product works as expected.

    Like other term riders, the cost can increase, but that increase is capped at a maximum guaranteed amount. The PUA conversion also helps keep the cost of the term rider in check by systematically reducing the amount of term insurance in the policy over time.

    In addition to the flexible protection rider, you can add one of 2 additional PUA riders:

    1) The Enhanced Permanent Paid-Up Additions Rider (EPPUA) or

    2) The Accelerated Permanent Paid-Up Additions Rider (APPUA)

    The enhanced permanent paid-up additions rider adds death benefit on top of the base whole life policy. The accelerated permanent paid-up additions rider replaces the term rider portion of the policy with PUAs more quickly than the normal FPR schedule allows.

    PUA Limits

    The maximum PUA cap is set at issue, based on the policy design, and cannot be more than 20X the base annual unrated premium, up to a $5M annual limit.

    Penn allows a maximum annual payment limit on the PUA rider that can exceed the normal scheduled PUA rider premiums. In other words, it’s possible to make a one-time lump sum PUA payment that exceeds the scheduled PUA rider payment. This option must be designed into the policy at issue. Penn also allows a lot of flexibility in its paid-up additions riders. You can raise the PUA rider payment to the maximum annual payment limit or lower it to zero. 

    The only requirement is you must make a minimum payment within any given 5-year period equal to 50% of the maximum annual payment limit. In other words, Penn’s PUA riders will terminate if cumulative PUA premiums made within the previous 5 policy years are less than 50% of the annual payment limit. Compared to some of the other insurers in this list, that’s pretty generous. And, between years 3 and 30 of the policy, you can make catch-up PUA payments equal to the difference between the previous year’s payment and the maximum annual payment limit for that year.

    Another unique thing about Penn’s whole life insurance product is it comes with an optional overloan protection rider. This rider is triggered in your old age if you accidentally borrow too much against your policy and it would trigger a lapse (and thus a huge tax bill). A very thoughtful little detail you won’t find on other whole life policies.

    Choosing the Right Dividend-Paying Whole Life Insurance Company

    You’re going to be tempted to go with the company that illustrates the highest cash accumulation on paper.

    Don’t.

    Whole life insurance illustrations can be very deceiving. All of the carriers listed above should perform very well over the next 30 years based on how their current general account is performing and their current investment philosophy and product portfolio. They are all highly-rated insurers, and serious players in the accumulation whole life space.

    That said, I’ve personally seen illustrations where the highest-illustrating product underperforms a lower-illustrated product in real life. I’ve also seen inforce illustrations where the dividend rate stays the same or increases and yet the actual dividends paid is lower than illustrated. Some of this has to do with how the company pays dividends to policies on inforce business, and what happens to mortality and expense charges in the future. For example, it’s possible for the dividend rate to remain level or increase, yet policyholders see actual dividends paid decrease. 

    How can this be?

    Simple. 

    The dividend rate (which is what always gets touted by companies and agents) represents just the investment portion of the dividend. There are actually 3 different components to the dividend:

    1. Mortality savings
    2. Expense savings
    3. Investment gain

    The first 2 can really eat into the 3rd if the insurer was overreaching on their assumptions.

    So… instead of being hyper-focused on the illustrated performance of the policy, be hyper-focused on how the insurer runs its business. I write a lot about this in, How To Choose A Mutual Life Insurance Company. 

  • How To Choose A Mutual Life Insurance Company

    Much has been written on the Internet about buying a good dividend-paying whole life insurance policy, but not so much has been written about choosing a good mutual life insurance company.

    And when someone does write about this topic, the advice is pretty thin and typically amounts to, “make sure you choose a well-run mutual life insurance company“… and that’s it.

    That’s the beginning and end of the discussion.

    WAIT, WHUT?

    Not very helpful. We can do better than that, can’t we?

    WHY COMPANY CHOICE MATTERs

    Before I get to the meat of the matter, I want to put something front and center that very often gets ignored:

    When you buy a whole life policy, you’re not just buying a product. You’re actually buying an extension of the life insurer’s general investment account (GIA).

    The whole life insurance policy is, in many ways, the conduit into the insurer’s GIA.

    Because of this, company choice is almost as important, maybe more important, than choosing a policy (and definitely more important than the sales illustration). Any promises or guarantees you buy are ultimately only as good as the financial strength of the issuing company, so it makes sense that you want to be doing business with a mutual insurer that’s strong enough to make good on those promises, right?

    You basically have 2 choices in the marketplace:

    1. Stock companies and;
    2. Mutual companies

    Stock companies almost never sell dividend-paying whole life, so that leaves us with mutual companies.

    Mutual companies are private companies owned by their policyholders. While some stock companies do sell whole life insurance, most stock companies specialize in term and universal life insurance. Mutual companies tend to sell a range of products, with whole life insurance being the “bread and butter” or flagship of their product line, supplemented by convertible term insurance and universal life products.

    THE PLAYERS

    Northwestern Mutual (NML)

    If you looked up the definition of “mutual life insurer” in the dictionary, there would be a picture of Northwestern Mutual.

    They are the responsible, rule-following, older brother of the old mutuals. In many ways, they were and are a test case for what a mutual life insurance company can be. The hallmark of a good mutual life insurer is they spread the costs and benefit across all policyholders and do it in a fair and equitable manner. NML does this in spades, and they’re very upfront about it (even in their advertising).

    The company also sports some of the best financial ratings any company could get in any industry, and its balance sheet is clean as a whistle. Roughly $1.7 billion of investable cash flows into the company’s general investment account every month. The company is so large that a 0.1% change in the value of their investment portfolio is equal to $275 million——a sum larger than the total size of most companies in the U.S. But, for NML, that sum of money is a rounding error. 

    Unlike many publicly-traded life insurers, Northwestern Mutual trades almost entirely on its immaculate reputation, and not hypothetical illustrated rates, product gimmicks, or pricing concessions or other marketing gimmicks. This is why you don’t typically see Northwestern Mutual agents tout “rate of return” in their sales presentations. They’re more likely to emphasize the low net cost of NML’s policies or the financial strength of the company (or their dividend).

    As a result, for better or worse, Northwestern Mutual does not feel any real pressure to be competitive in their product pricing, features, or benefits.

    Its flagship whole life insurance product is exactly what you would expect from a mutual carrier. And, while it also offers other life, annuity, and disability products, whole life insurance has always been its bread and butter.

    New York Life (NYL)

    New York Life is Northwestern Mutual’s slightly rebellious younger brother, and the oldest mutual life insurer in the U.S. Its business is essentially divided into two parts. One part is a classic “old school” mutual life insurer that sells lots of participating whole life insurance. 

    The other side of their business sells tons of non-participating life and annuity products. Like Northwestern Mutual, they have stellar financial ratings. Unlike Northwestern Mutual, they seem to have this idea that they need to be more competitive in their pricing and product features. 

    Their Custom Whole Life product is one of only two products available on the market (at the time of this writing) that allows a policyholder to have a fully customized whole life product complete with customized payment periods. NYL’s new 10-pay whole life product wants to compete with the smaller mutuals in terms of performance, but demands a higher minimum premium payment for the privilege. And, finally, they have a “plain Jane” participating whole life product which, in spite of its lackluster name (it doesn’t really have a name), it’s actually quite good on the performance side of things—call it a little hidden gem.

    While the numbers aren’t as big as Northwestern Mutual, they’re nothing to sneeze at, either. In 2021, they posted capital and surplus of $30.7 billion, $1.4 billion in insurance sales, $760 billion in assets under management, and $1.1 trillion of life insurance in force.

    MassMutual

    Speaking of large, MassMutual.

    The company was the number one seller of whole life insurance in the U.S. in 2017. One of the things that seems to have helped the company immensely is its actuaries and product developers tweaked their flagship products to have a higher illustrated performance than many of its competitors. On paper, this made MassMutual look a lot better than its peers. It also held its dividend payout steady when many of its peers were forced to lower their dividend rate.

    MassMutual is one of maybe a handful of companies that publishes a decades-long historical dividend performance chart, including the actual (not hypothetical) historical performance of its flagship whole life products since 1980. That historical performance compares very favorably against its peers.

    The company has $235 billion invested assets, $33 billion in total capital and surplus, and paid $1.8 billion in dividends to participating whole life policyholders in 2021.

    The Guardian

    The Guardian is sort of the odd-man out in the brotherhood of old mutuals. In some ways, it’s similar to Northwestern Mutual in that its insurance agents sell the company over the illustration. Because of this, Guardian doesn’t seem to feel many of the usual competitive pressures of running a mutual company.

    At the same time, the company endlessly tweaks its products, tinkers with features and benefits, and seems to always be revamping one of its products. It feels like the company is always gearing up for battle… but with who?

    By the end of 2021, Guardian had $10.7 total adjusted capital and surplus, $90.2 billion in assets under management, and paid $1.1 billion in dividends to its participating whole life policyholders. It’s considered a smaller mutual. But, given its dividend payments to policyholders, it also feels like it’s punching above its weight.

    It offers one of the most flexible paid-up additions riders of any mutual insurance carrier. Most carriers are lacking in this regard.

    Not Guardian.

    Policyholders can vary their paid-up additions premiums almost “at will”, without any negative consequences on future premium funding.

    The company also seems to really listen to its field force, and caters to powerful and very vocal General Agents, which is a sharp contrast to other life insurance companies. 

    With that said, many of its General Agents seem to be more obsessed with Guardian’s unbeatable individual disability insurance products than its participating whole life products.

    Penn Mutual

    Speaking of punching above its weight, the baby of the bunch, Penn Mutual, fits this description perfectly.

    The company is the second-oldest mutual life insurer in the United States, paying dividends to participating whole life policyholders for 175 consecutive years. By the end of 2021, it had total GAAP Assets of $44.2 billion, with a total of $185 billion assets under the company’s control. It paid $123 million in dividends to its participating whole life policyholders, and had $3.2 billion in total capital and surplus.

    Penn Mutual keeps a significant portion of its investment portfolio (77.9%) in cash, short-term investments, and investment-grade bonds. The remainder of its general account is invested more aggressively to help bump the dividend payments to policyholders.

    What really sets Penn Mutual apart from its peers is its size (it’s by far the smallest of the old mutuals), its aggressiveness in developing a cloud-based platform (it runs the most technologically advanced underwriting platform in the insurance industry, with an unusually short, but accurate, underwriting process), and its aggressiveness in product design and sales (it has one of the most flexible whole life products on the market, and pushes the product hard through its independent broker channels). 

    But… maybe one of the more unique things about this little company from Horsham, PA is its commitment to life insurance sales. Unlike all the other mutual life insurers, Penn Mutual is almost exclusively a life insurance and annuity carrier.

    Maybe the only other company that can say that is Northwestern Mutual. But, even NML runs a sizable long-term care and disability insurance business. Looking at Penn’s financial statements, the two largest lines of business are fixed life insurance (whole life and universal life) and fixed annuities.

    When Penn Mutual says its bread and butter is life insurance, they mean it.

    WHAT TO LOOK FOR IN A MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

    A company that’s serious about life insurance

    If I ran a hamburger joint that sold one kind of hamburger, but I had 3 different kinds of salads, 5 chicken sandwich options, and was more famous for my milkshakes than my hamburgers, what business am I really in?

    I think you know the answer—not a hamburger business. 

    The same holds true for life insurance companies.

    Believe it or not, not all companies are serious about their life insurance business. You can tell a life insurance company loves life insurance because they put it front and center in their business. It’s not hiding behind a portfolio of disability insurance, long-term care insurance, retirement planning services, employer benefits packages and so on.

    It’s such a simple thing to look for, yet often ignored by policyholders. Does the company have a rich life insurance product line, or an anemic one? Does the company focus mostly on individual life insurance, or do they seem to have their hand in a little bit of everything?

    Do the general agencies for these companies want to talk your ear off about the company’s life insurance products, or are they more interested in selling you disability, long-term care, or some other line of insurance? A company committed to its life insurance business isn’t going to abandon it when things get rough. A company that’s not serious about its business will arrange things so that the life insurance block can be sold off to another company without too much trouble. 

    Over the course of 100+ years, there will be a decade or two that’s rough. The insurer should be committed to plowing through those rough periods and not abandoning its policyholders for the “next big thing”.

    Net income

    Net income is income after dividends have been paid to policyholders. The corporate structure of a mutual insurer or mutual holding company legally requires the insurance company to pay dividends if it is capable of doing so (i.e. if the company has surplus it can afford to pay as a dividend and still meet all its financial guarantees/obligations). What we want to see, then, is how well the insurance company can turn premiums into cash flow (income) and then… how much of that cash flow (income) the insurer is able to turn over to policyholders (the owners of the company) as dividends.

    A low net income figure on the company’s balance sheet might mean the insurer is paying out a lot of whatever income it received as dividends. So, low net income is good, but… not too low. The closer that net income figure gets to zero, the more we have to pay attention to what’s happening with the insurer’s investments because… a very low net income can potentially point to a strain on the insurer’s income and thus… its ability to pay a good dividend. If the insurer doesn’t have sufficient net income to pay a dividend, it may end up pulling dividends out of surplus, which isn’t necessarily bad, unless… surplus starts to decreases year after year.

    Bottom line is to track your insurance company’s dividend payment as a ratio or percent of its net income and gross revenue. Most of its income should be paid back to you as a dividend. And, it should be able to maintain a good dividend out of current investment income over long periods of time. If the insurer has to dip into surplus, it should be able to regrow that surplus without too much trouble.

    Stable yield on invested assets (not high, not low)

    A fluctuating investment return is not a great thing. Ideally, you want a stable investment return over 20+ years. Stable returns mean stable income. Stable income means a stable dividend payment. You see where I’m going with this?

    Lots of income-producing assets

    Total return on invested assets is the general measure of an insurance company’s ability to turn premium dollars into income-producing assets. The more income the company generates, the higher dividend the company can afford to pay and thus the more money you receive from your life insurance company. Insurers are really, really, good at doing this — better than almost any other investor, but… not all insurers are “great” when compared to their peers.

    When income-producing assets aren’t enough, it should have ample money set aside in its Interest Maintenance Reserve (IMR). The IMR is money generated from capital gains, which is then amortized over many years or on an “as-needed” basis.

    An example of how this was recently used: In 2019, The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company cashed in some of its bond investments for a $47 million capital gain. This capital gain went into the insurer’s Interest Maintenance Reserve (IMR). The reserve can then be used as needed or amortized over many years to boost the company’s net income. 

    The IMR can be funded with both bond and non-bond investments.

    For insurers with large unrealized capital gains in equities, the IMR allows insurers to effectively and safely convert equity risks into a steady income that benefits both the company and policyholders. In a low interest rate environment, the IMR can become a hedge against falling interest rates or extreme volatility in interest rates.

    In other words, having a large(ish) IMR is a safety net, of sorts.

    High liquidity to meet cash loan requests

    A highly liquid company is better than a company with a lot of illiquid assets. Generally, the more liquid its assets, the better. An insurer with 70% liquidity is in a more stable position than a company with 50% liquidity.

    Low leverage (debt) relative to investment return

    Insurers use leverage (debt) to help boost their investment return. Most companies are really good at doing this, but not all of them. How they accomplish this is beyond the discussion of this email but… in general, the ideal scenario is low leverage relative to the investment return. If a company uses a lot of debt but has a low return on its investments, that can signal a problem.

    Low-risk insurance products

    Whole life insurance is a low risk financial product. For all intents and purposes, it’s risk-free, dare I say “bulletproof”. The way whole life insurance becomes a serious risk is if life insurers sell a bunch of short-pay whole life insurance with a 4% guarantee, and then interest rates promptly go to 0% and get stapled there for decades.

    On the other hand, variable annuities with generous guarantees are nearly always toxic to life insurers.

    Insurers that offer generous guarantees inside of variable annuity and life insurance products may be hiding risk to policyholders. These risks are sometimes not realized for years.

    On the surface, some of these risky products don’t look risky which is what makes them so dangerous. Insurance company management, insurer portfolio managers, product developers, insurance actuaries, and insurance agents who are familiar with how life insurance and annuity products work will know this. Your average investor (including hedge funds and private equity funds) won’t.

    For example, life insurers selling generous guaranteed minimum accumulation (or income) benefit riders inside variable annuities place immense pressure on their own general investment account. A casual look at the product lineup doesn’t show anything out of place. But, a keen observer will see the liabilities stacking up. And, this risk is systemic, bleeding into other unrelated lines of business. 

    Another serious risk to life insurers is guaranteed universal life. Guaranteed UL products require immense amounts of capital, and they often put significant pressure on the insurer. This is why you are now seeing many life insurance companies offload their guaranteed UL blocks.

    Knowing your life insurer means not just knowing its whole life product. It means also knowing its other lines of business and how risky those products are and whether (or not) they pose any serious risk to whole life policyholders. 

    Competent management

    A “well-run” mutual life insurer will elect its chief actuary, investment manager, or risk officer as its CEO. 

    The old mutuals all have CEOs that are either the company’s chief actuary, its chief investment officer, or are individuals with years of risk-management experience. This is a large part of what makes these companies so well-run. They aren’t simply MBAs or “career CEOs”. They are CEOs whose specialty and expertise is in the life insurance business. They understand the risks of the business and of the products the insurance company sells.

    The insurance companies that eventually develop financial problems almost always have upper management who don’t really and truly understand the financial risks of the insurance products the company sells. This was the case with a recent high-profile merger where the insurer blew a massive hole in its balance sheet (and needed a bail out from a larger financial firm) because management didn’t really know what it was doing with its products.

    Flexible product chassis

    A good product chassis is one that is inherently low risk, very flexible, and accommodating to the policyholder. Lots of life insurance companies sell universal life insurance. That passes the “flexible” test. Universal life insurance policies have the most flexible premium structure of any life insurance policy. But, they are also very risky because the expense loads are variable instead of fixed. Meaning, an insurance company has the contractual right to increase costs over time inside a universal life policy. Agents are quick to point out that insurers wouldn’t want to do this. The fact of the matter is, many have increased those costs and continue to do so. If reputation becomes a problem, insurers sell off the subsidiary company with the bad rep, start a new subsidiary, and launch new products.

    Traditional whole life insurance is not a flexible product. But, it became more flexible in the 1980s with the introduction of the paid-up additions rider, and various “limited pay” policy designs. It became even more flexible with the introduction of supplemental term insurance riders. 

    A common solution for flexible “limited pay” products is to sell the policyholder a “10-pay” whole life policy. What if you want to pay for 11 years or 15 or 17 years? You can’t.

    Most companies don’t have products that are essentially “X-pay” (custom pay) products where you can choose how many years you want to pay whole life premiums. Custom-pay products offer, by far, the most flexible chassis available in the life insurance industry.

    Many companies do offer a “reduced paid-up” (RPU) option on their whole life products. Sometimes, this option has limitations. The RPU option reduces the death benefit, and eliminates the ability to pay premiums in the future.

    Some companies offer a “premium offset” option, which allows a policyholder to temporarily stop premiums, using current dividend payments plus previously accumulated dividends and paid up additions to pay current premiums. Under this option, premiums can potentially be stopped and started many times.

    Not all life insurers have a flexible premium paid-up additions (PUA) rider. Most companies don’t want policyholders changing their PUA rider payments. Once a policyholder reduces or stops paying on a PUA rider, the company will often disallow future PUA payments, or they will restrict PUA rider payments. A good PUA rider is one that allows unscheduled PUA payments, allowing the policyholder to stop and start PUA premiums as needed.

    The most flexible whole life policy designs are ones that include a supplemental term rider, paid-up additions rider, and a flexible premium offset option that can be turned on and off whenever the policyholder wants with a secondary option to convert the policy to a “reduced, paid up” status.

    In general, the more flexible the whole life policy, the better.

    WHAT ABOUT RATINGS?

    Financial ratings are the thing everyone looks at, but are (mostly) a red herring. They can indicate the general financial strength of a life insurance company. But, most insurance companies have great financial ratings so it doesn’t tell you much on its own. Plus, ratings tell you about where an insurance company has been, not where it is going. In other words, great financial ratings speak to the life insurer’s past accomplishments, and what financial decisions led them up to where they are today. But, it doesn’t say anything about how today’s financial decisions will affect them 20 years from today.

    Financial ratings refer to an insurer’s ability to pay its guarantees on its policies, right now. Ratings aren’t worthless. But, in the context of dividend payments and return on the cash value of whole life policies, they don’t mean much. Almost every life insurer in the U.S. is “overpowered,” meaning it has more than enough money to make good on its promises today. But, some insurers don’t pay a high dividend relative to their peers because they aren’t as good with their investments.

    There are a few more metrics a policyholder can look at, but these are the major ones.

    Where can you get all this information? 

    One of the best sources is ALIRT. ALIRT is an independent research firm which analyzes insurance company financial data. They gather information on life insurance companies in the U.S. and then build a financial summary out of the data. They can tell how much an insurer earns, what it has earned over the last 5+ years, and what its future prospects are for generating more income and revenue for policyholders (or shareholders, in the case of publicly-traded life insurers). 

    Unfortunately, their reports cost many thousands of dollars each, and their subscription service is tens of thousands of dollars per year — not practical for consumers to purchase and even if a consumer wanted to see the information, there’s a good chance they wouldn’t know how to read the financial statements or summary reports. 

    Fortunately, you can download a company’s financial reports directly from the insurer’s website or by contacting them directly and asking for a copy of their financial statements. Some insurers are better than others when it comes to handing over the info or making it available online.

    Unfortunately, combing through a life insurer’s financial statements is more difficult than reading the ALIRT summaries. 

    Another source for summaries of financial statements is Vital Signs. This may or may not be accessible to consumers. It certainly is accessible to life insurance agents.

    What Happens If An OLD MUTUAL COMPANy Goes BANKRUPT?

    Could there be a run on the insurance company?

    A “run on the bank” is when enough depositors freak out, get scared, and demand their money back all at the same time that it causes the bank to go bankrupt. 

    So… can this happen to a life insurance company?

    Yes, but it’s unlikely. In the vast majority of scenarios, a run on the insurance company is not an issue.

    For example, last year Penn Mutual had about $2 billion in surplus funds. Its total bond holdings were about $10 billion. That’s a 20% surplus against those bonds. 

    In order for the insurance company to be in any real trouble, a combination of very unrealistic events would have to happen in a very specific order. 

    First, interest rates would have to spike by an unheard of amount (even today’s sudden rise in interest rates is not that much in the grand scheme of things), which would cause the value of their current bond holdings to drop. And, that spike would have to be significant enough to chew up the insurer’s $2 billion in surplus, meaning the value of those bonds would have to drop by $2 billion (20% or so). That’s a huge drop… 

    Next, every single policyholder would have to come to the insurance company at the same time, and request a full surrender of their cash value life insurance policy. 

    If the value of an insurer’s bonds drop significantly, that — in and of itself — is not immediately concerning. As long as the insurer can still make profitable investments and all their policyholders don’t make liquidation requests at the same time, you’re good.

    But… even if this series of unfortunate and unrealistic events happened, the insurance company has a protection mechanism (as do all other life insurers) — they can delay surrender and payment of cash values for up to 6 months to prevent a liquidity crisis and to protect other policyholders (and to make sure everyone is paid back in full).

    That’s why I often say whole life insurance is bulletproof. 

    Those are not protections you see in fixed income investments, stock investments, or any other type of investments. 

    To give you some perspective, Northwestern Mutual has about 15% in surplus against their bonds. MassMutual has about 18-19% in surplus against their bond holdings, give or take. New York Life has about 19% or so in surplus. 

    I would say most of the old mutuals are very well protected against even a catastrophic event. We would have to see the literal end-of-days before you would experience a real problem with a whole life insurance policy. And, even then… it’s questionable as to whether it would be that bad.

    So, there you have it. Choose a well-run mutual life insurance company and you should be fine.

    Side-Note: CHOOSING A TERM INSURANCE COMPANY

    Term insurance sometimes get the shaft ’round these parts, but it can be a valuable part of your financial plan, too. 

    Reality is, you can’t always afford to buy your full human life value using whole life insurance (at least, not right away).

    This is where term insurance comes in handy. Term insurance allows you to preserve your insurability for the future, while getting you into a life insurance policy you need right now.

    Some life insurance companies have chosen to specialize in term life insurance, making it their core product offering. But since term insurance is just a death benefit, the product has essentially been commoditized, making it an extremely competitive market.

    This is good for life insurance buyers, but it’s not always clear who offers the best long-term deal. Premium is clearly the driving factor for a lot of policyholders. And yet, many term life carriers price their term products with the assumption that at least some policyholders will resist the premium shock after the level premium period ends and keep paying rapidly escalating premium costs. And… they’re right. According to the latest report on U.S. Post-Level Term Lapse and Mortality Experience by the Society of Actuaries, a small number of people do keep their level term policies after the level premium period ends.

    Aside from those minority of policyholders, and all other things being equal, a policyholder would much rather keep an existing life insurance policy in force at the same premium than pay a higherpremium. If they can’t do that, many policyholders would like the option to convert to a permanent policy (either with a lower death benefit to keep the premium level or a new higher premium that’s level instead of increasing) if given the opportunity. But if a policyholder doesn’t buy a convertible policy, then their options are limited. They can keep the policy they have and pay the rising cost of insurance after the level premium period ends, or they can apply for new coverage at an older age when premiums will be higher and underwriting not as favorable.

    On the other hand, buying a 30-year level term policy, with the option to convert to a permanent policy, gives the policyholder more choices and more control over their future. Choosing a company where you have no options other than to pay the premium or lapse the policy can be an expensive mistake. Some term policies don’t even allow you to keep paying the premium. Some companies sell a 10-pay term product where the policy simply terminates after 10 years. There is no automatic renewal at a higher premium. The policy simply ends and you have to reapply for a new policy.

    Again, the Internet will tell you this is fine and that you probably don’t need term insurance after it terminates, but let’s assume for a moment that not everything goes according to plan and you still need the insurance (after all, the whole point of insurance is that things don’t go according to plan, right?).

    What do you do?

    This is why convertibility is so important. Being able to convert a term policy to a permanent policy like whole life insurance (or even a simple guaranteed UL product) is better than getting nothing in return.

    Convertible term products can also be sold on the secondary life settlement market, and this is where things get interesting. 

    The life settlement market is where investors buy unwanted life insurance policies. An anonymous investor buys your policy, through a broker, and then owns the policy. He makes himself the beneficiary. When you die, the insurer pays him the death benefit (which is why anonymity is important in these transactions).

    A policyholder with a term policy that expires with no conversion options has (essentially) a burning match. No one wants burning matches. A convertible policy has market value, and implied equity, which many investors are willing to pay for. Instead of letting the term policy lapse worthless (and losing all those premiums you paid), you could sell it to an investor who may pay you thousands, or hundreds of thousands, of dollars.

    If you’re buying a convertible term policy, and you are buying from a high-quality company, you are probably buying from a mutual life insurance company. However, there are also many high-quality term products being sold by stock companies.

    The important thing for term insurance is its convertibility. You want something that can be converted into another high-quality product. So, when shopping for term insurance, check out the company’s permanent products, because this is where you’re ultimately headed.

    SOURCES

    U.S. Post-Level Term Lapse And Mortality Experience

    Bradfield, Aisling, et al. “Member | SOA.” Society Of Actuaries, May 2021, https://www.soa.org/498d18/globalassets/assets/files/resources/research-report/2021/us-post-level-term-lapse-mort-report.pdf. 

  • The Cost Of Whole Life Insurance Vs. Buy Term And Invest The Difference [With Complete Commission and Fee Breakdown]

    I feel like this one has been a long time in the making. Yes, the “whole life insurance vs buy term and invest the difference” debate has been done to death, but… look over the landscape.

    What’s missing?

    A complete breakdown of the actual costs of both strategies over a long period of time. I mean, isn’t that amazing? Look around. You will not find an honest breakdown of the actual internal costs of whole life insurance vs term insurance. What you usually find are premium breakdowns.

    By “cost”, I mean the total costs associated with mortality and expense, not just commissions paid to agents, fees paid to financial advisors, or worse… a perfunctory glance at the difference in premiums. Premiums do not represent just costs. Premiums include amounts set aside for cash reserves (even for term insurance) and, sometimes, they can hide certain costs. This makes some options appear better (or worse) than they really are.

    So, my goal here is to give you a deeper insight into the embedded, assumed, implied, and the actual costs of both strategies.

    OK, let’s get into it.

    Summary: Cost Of Whole Life Insurance vs. Term Insurance Costs + Investment Fees

    Summary: Cost Of Whole Life Insurance

    • Policyholder: 45 yr-old male, standard, non-smoker
    • Policy: $1 million whole life
    • Premium: $18,179/yr
    • 76-year total net cost: $2,765,390.50
    • 30-year total net cost: $209,092.16
    • Commissions paid to life insurance agents (included in total costs): Between $17,815.42 and $28,453.52, depending on the commission structure for the insurance agent

    I found the lifetime cost of a whole life policy (76 years in this analysis) was $2,765,390.50. This includes a calculation of the full mortality and expense charges of the policy, which includes commissions paid to the life insurance agent.

    I also looked at a more narrow, “real world”, scenario where a policyholder chooses between buying a whole life policy and paying premiums for 30 years versus buying a 30-year level term and investing the difference for the same period of time.

    Let’s be real. This is what most people will do.

    Mortality and expense (M&E) charges for 30 years totaled $209,092.16, before adjusting for M&E credits. Commissions paid to the insurance agent (which are included in M&E) totaled between $17,815.42 and $28,453.52, depending on the commission structure for the insurance agent. Life insurance agents get paid different amounts, based on their contract with the issuing life insurer or their general agent. In general, new life insurance agents get paid less than seasoned insurance agents.

    Summary: Cost Of Term Life Insurance + Investment Fees

    • Policyholder: 45 yr-old male, standard, non-smoker
    • Policy: $1 million term life
    • Premium: $3,309/yr, investing the remaining $14,870.12
    • 76-year total cost: Between $5,093,306.09 and $10,450,740.64, depending on the rate of return earned and the fees charged
    • 30-year total cost: Between $186,274.92 and $307,113.01
    • Commissions and fees paid to life insurance agents and advisors (included in total costs): Between $89,324.73 and $213,107.73

    I shopped multiple insurance companies and found the total lifetime costs (76 years) for term and investing fees to be between $5,093,306.09 and $10,450,740.64, depending on the rate of return earned and the fees charged, a significant sum compared to the whole life policy.

    The cost for term and the fees paid to a plan administrator or financial planner for a buy term and invest the difference plan over the same 30 years ranged between $186,274.92 and $307,113.01. The large discrepancy is the result of the large difference in both assumed rate of return and the fee structures of financial planners. Higher rates of return result in more investment management fees being paid on larger account balances.

    Total commissions paid to the life insurance agent + investment fees (which will be slightly lower than the total premiums + investment management fees) were between $89,324.73 and $213,107.73.

    Although this analysis showed whole life was mostly (but not always) cheaper than an equivalent buy term, invest the difference strategy, this doesn’t necessarily mean a whole life policy is better than investing or buying a term policy, as I’ll explain later. But as far as cost is concerned, whole life tends to be cheaper in every instance except when a 4% return assumption is used and taxes are excluded from the cost analysis.

    Basic Assumptions And Limitations Of This Analysis

    What’s an analysis without assumptions?

    Every analysis has to make some basic assumptions. Problem is, the way these kinds of analyses are usually done leaves much to be desired. 

    Here’s what I mean: usually, life insurance agents and financial planners will explain the costs of whole life policies in simplistic terms—quoting the premiums for each. Since whole life premiums are always higher than term premiums, the assumption is the cost for a whole life policy must be higher.

    This is a non-sequitur.

    Premiums for whole life are higher than for term because a large portion of the premium must be set aside for the cash value of the policy. A term policy has no cash value. This is why “invest the difference” looks at investing the money saved by not buying a whole life policy.

    If you want a good sense for how much each strategy costs, look at the total costs for both strategies over a long period of time. “Cost” means embedded costs in the policy, which includes not just commissions paid to the life insurance agent but also the actual mortality and other policy expenses (i.e. M&E).

    This is not nearly as easy to do as a perfunctory glance at the premiums, but it’s far more accurate.

    For whole life, I reverse engineer the mortality and expense charges of the policy using the known premium, cash value, and compounding rate (i.e. the dividend rate)—a little trick I learned from my fellow insurance agent, Brian Fechtel. I then isolate and add back in the mortality and expense credits from the insurance company. 

    For buy term and invest the difference, I look at the term premium and commissions earned, plus the investment fees associated with investing in a tax-favored investment account, which includes fees you will typically find inside a 401(k) or other retirement plan as well as fees a financial planner might charge you to manage your investments. The calculation of these fees is based on the latest research available from the Investment Company Institute, 401(k) Averages Book, 23rd Edition, and data compiled by AdvisoryHQ.

    I compiled the data, and did this analysis, so you could get an idea of how pricing for life insurance and investments work, and get a sense for the relative costs of each. This is not meant to be financial, tax, legal, or insurance advice. Just an informational analysis. All life insurance numbers (i.e. tabular values, illustrations) were obtained using quoting software commonly available to licensed life insurance agents, so the numbers are accurate insofar as the illustrations go. 

    Even so, there are some limitations to this kind of analysis. Here are the big ones:

    • This analysis looks at only one age, gender, risk rating, and policy type. Policy type and design by the life insurance agent can affect a policy’s internal costs. It also assumes the dividend rate for whole life remains level.
    • In my almost 20 years of doing this, I’ve never seen dividend rates stay flat. They will vary greatly depending on the bond holdings of the company, current interest rates, profitability from supplemental lines of business, and several factors that are outside the scope of this analysis. Even in a falling rate environment, I’ve seen insurers raise dividends. So… a flat dividend rate is unlikely to occur for decades at a time. In a rising interest rate environment, dividend rates do tend to rise. In a falling rate environment, dividend rates do tend to fall. Though, dividends can and do fluctuate up and down contra interest rates. This will affect the overall costs of a whole life policy. Cost of insurance is also highly sensitive to age, gender, and risk rating, so it’s very possible a different age, gender, or risk rating will show radically different results. For example, coverage for a 45 year old (both term and whole life) will be more expensive than for younger ages. Likewise, the cost for coverage would be higher for older ages. Also, males pay more (sometimes, substantiallymore) than females, which would alter the results (possibly significantly). If dividend rates rise from the initial projected rate, it can reduce the illustrated costs of the policy. The reverse is also true. Finally, a preferred, or better, rating will dramatically reduce the cost of insurance (especially for whole life).
    • In this analysis, I used a flat-fee assumption for investment fees, which understates the fees charged for investment management, particularly for professionally-managed investments. In reality, fees are higher (sometimes substantially higher) for smaller portfolio amounts, with fees increasing and decreasing at various portfolio sizes. I assumed a lower overall fee structure rather than using different fees at various portfolio sizes.
    • Commissions can vary greatly depending on the actual commission structure of the agent, the insurance company, and the product itself. This won’t affect the total costs of the policy shown in this analysis (since commissions are inclusive of the total M&E), but a different commission rate might make the commissions look higher or lower than illustrated in this analysis. For example, one insurance company might pay life insurance agents a lower or higher commission than another, even for the same product. The insurance company might have different “tiers” or grid systems it uses to pay insurance agents based on personal production or sales performance.
    • Taxes are not included in this cost analysis. Taxes will tend to increase the cost of the buy term and invest the different strategy only if or when the investment is “cashed out” and spent. In contrast, a whole life policy offers a couple of different options to use the cash value but avoid taxes. Since this analysis did not include a “spend down” of the investment or cash value, these costs were omitted.

    Life Insurance Policy + Investment Assumptions

    Here are some basic assumptions I made when assembling the insurance quotes and investment data:

    • Insurance is on a male, age 45, standard, non-smoker buying a $1 million life insurance policy. For the whole life illustration, I use a term blend and paid-up additions rider to fund the policy with the required premium.
    • I shopped multiple companies for term quotes using CompuLife®, a trusted quoting service/software that many agents use. I also obtained term quotes from the major mutual carriers, including Penn Mutual, MassMutual, and The Guardian. For whole life, I compared quotes and prepared illustrations from MassMutual, The Guardian, and Penn Mutual.
    • Unless otherwise stated, all premiums are paid annually and all investment contributions are received at the beginning of the year, in full.
    • Commissions are based on a percentage of annual premiums paid rather than a payment grid or any of the other commission structures available to agents.
    • Investment assumptions for “buy term and invest the difference” use a 4%, 6%, and 8% compounding rate. 
    • Investment fees will be based on data obtained from the 2022 Investment Company Institute report on 401(k) fees and the 23rd edition of the 401(k) Averages Book. For self-managed tax-advantaged retirement accounts, I assume the average “all in” (mutual fund + admin) fee for large plans equal to 0.88% of account assets annually. For professionally-managed investments, I assume a median expense ratio of 0.33% and a 1.02% AUM fee.
    • This analysis will show the full cost for carrying term to maximum insurable age (94), as well as costs for investing to age 121 to match the whole life policy illustration. Most people who buy term and invest the difference will purchase (at most) a 30 year term insurance policy, then drop the term, so I also show the costs associated with this scenario.

    How Much Life Insurance Costs

    Let’s get this out of the way first.

    The cost of insurance always increases over time, regardless of the type of policy you buy. Older = higher risk of death, and thus, higher mortality costs which translates into a higher premium for the coverage.

    All policies are built on the 1-year annually renewable/yearly renewable term life chassis. This means when you buy a 1-year renewable policy, you pay the premium for one year’s worth of insurance. The following year, the insurer renews your policy at a new rate that reflects your new (older) age and you pay the premium for that year’s worth of coverage. Each year you renew your policy, the premium (and cost) of the policy increases until you get mad and quit.

    The only real difference between level term and whole life is how the insurance company chooses to levelize the premium, and what other benefits or bells and whistles the company wants to add to the policy. Policies with lots of benefits have a higher premium than policies with fewer benefits.

    Annual Cost For An Annually-Renewable Term Policy

    Here’s what the annual costs look like for an annually-renewable (also called “yearly renewable”) term insurance policy (45 yr-old male, std, non-smoker):

    Graph showing annually-renewable term life insurance costs
    Annual costs for annually-renewable term insurance for a 45 year-old male, std rating, non-smoker. Premium starts at $1,530 in year 1, and climbs to $335,240 in year 50, with a maximum guaranteed annual premium of $485,080. Total cumulative premiums for 30 years equals $655,790. Cumulative total lifetime premiums are $4,092,260

    For this particular policy, the first year non-guaranteed premium is $1,530. The premium rises each year until the 50th year, when the annual premium is $335,240. However, the annual premiums could be much higher. If the current assumptions change, the 50th-year guaranteed premium could be $485,080.

    Cumulative Costs For An Annually-Renewable Term Policy

    Cumulative costs for this annually-renewable policy over 30 years is $655,790. The cumulative lifetime total cost over 50 years is $4,092,260, but these premiums could be higher under the guaranteed assumptions, up to $5,930,610.

    Costs For 30-Year Level Term + Annually Renewable Policy

    Many (but not all) people drop their term policy after 30 years because the cost skyrockets. But to give a true “apples to apples” comparison, I looked at the total costs for term. Even 30-year level term gets expensive after a while (click image to enlarge).

    Graph showing 30-year level term, then switching to annually-renewable term life insurance once the level premium period ends.
    Annual costs for 30-year level term insurance, then switching to annually-renewable term insurance once the level premium period ends. The costs for this policy for a 45 year-old male, std rating, non-smoker is $99,270 over the first 30 years. Cumulative total costs over 50 years is $7,778,490.
    30 year term cost, plus yearly renewable term to maximum insurable age.
    30-year term life insurance cost, plus yearly renewable term out to maximum insurable age of 95 (50 years). Total term cost is $7,778,490.

    Total costs for 30-year level, then yearly renewal thereafter is $7.7 million. 

    If that sounds like a lot of money, it’s because it is. Even a 30-year level term policy with renewal options is going to be expensive. In fact, the 30-year level policy is more expensive than the regular yearly-renewable policy. 

    Why?

    Many life insurers break even or lose money on the level premium period in anticipation of policyholders renewing at the (much) higher yearly-renewable rate. Contrary to popular opinion, not everyone drops their policy after 30 years. Insurers have found a significant percentage of policyholders keep paying the increasing cost of the term policy… enough that it’s worth it to sell the policy at a loss or break even for the first 30 years. The company simply makes their profit on the back end of the policy when premiums skyrocket.

    All other things being equal, the lifetime cost for $1 million of life insurance for a 45 year old male (standard rating) should be between $4 million and $6 million, regardless of the policy type you’re buying. This is why life insurers levelize premiums and use their general investment account to “flatten” or “hold down” the rising cost of insurance for policyholders. Trying to pay for the pure cost of insurance each year is insanity.

    Levelized premium payments allow the insurance company to collect more than the cost of insurance in the early years of the policy. The higher premium paid in the early years of the policy is invested, and a portion of the investment earnings is used to pay for the rising insurance costs. In essence, the insurance company overcharges the policyholder in the early years of the policy so they can undercharge them later. 

    This is true of all level term policies, universal life, and whole life policies sold in the U.S., with the primary difference being how much more the insurer collects from the policyholder to invest.

    With term, the insurer collects just a little bit more, and keeps any overage that’s left over when the policy expires.

    With universal life and whole life, the insurer returns the excess to the policyholder through the cash value of the policy. Something else happens in a whole life policy and some forms of universal life, too. The cash value of the policy becomes the reserve used to pay for the future death benefit, so the pure insurance component of the policy is reduced as cash value increases. This reduction in the pure insurance amount effectively lowers the total cost of insurance, especially over very long periods of time.

    Whole Life Insurance Commissions

    Yay! Everyone’s favorite topic.

    Here’s the breakdown on how much life insurance agents get paid on whole life (click image to enlarge):

    Whole life insurance commission tables
    Whole life commissions depend on the agent’s compensation plan. Agents are paid based on a percentage of the base premium collected from the policyholder, plus excess over the base, typically from supplemental policy riders, including supplemental term riders and paid-up additional insurance riders. “Street comp” can be very low, but ultimately depends on the broker’s contract with a general agent or insurance company. Base commission rates are typically in the 50-55% range for first-year commissions, with compensation dropping dramatically in subsequent years. This is called “heaped commission”, and is common throughout the industry.

    Whole life is sold by either a captive or independent agent. However, most whole life is sold by captive agents (though, some independent agents do get direct appointments with insurers or work through general agents to get access to whole life carriers). 

    Life insurance agents typically earn a commission based on the first year premium amount as well as premiums paid in subsequent years. The exact commission earned will depend on the agent’s compensation plan. 

    A captive agent will work exclusively for one insurance company, and will have compensation tied into his salary, which might include other company benefits, like a retirement plan, disability coverage, and other benefits. An independent agent, however, typically doesn’t get company benefits since they don’t work directly for an insurer. Instead, the independent agent might represent multiple different insurance agencies, and receives compensation from either the insurer directly or from a general agent associated with the insurer. The compensation may only include basic “street comp”, or it might include “street comp” plus an override (additional money paid to the agent to offset marketing and other costs).

    Regardless, both types of agents sell insurance on commission.

    A captive agent might earn more or less than an independent agent, depending on the policy, and whether the insurance carrier bases the commission off of a target premium, a special payment grid, or as a percentage of the base premium + overrides.

    This commission structure assumes commissions are paid based on a percentage of the first year’s premium, plus overrides and renewal commissions in years 2+

    However, notice the first year commission (FYC) is much higher than in subsequent years. This is called a “heaped” commission. The commission percentage in the first year is high, then drops off for the renewal commissions earned in years 2+.

    The total commissions paid to the life insurance agent over 30 years might vary between $17,815.42 for insurance agents earning “street comp” (the lowest commission tier) and $33,722.05 for insurance agents earning a high override on all base premiums.

    Annual And Total Lifetime Costs For A Whole Life Policy (Cumulative M&E)

    Summary Of Costs

    • 76-year (gross) cost: $2,858,129.50
    • 76-year (net) cost: $2,765,390.50
    • 30-year (gross) cost: $229,391.16
    • 30-year (net) cost: $209,092.16

    Annual M&E is laid out in the following chart (click image to enlarge):

    Annual cost of whole life insurance graphic
    Annual cost for whole life insurance rises each year, just like term insurance. Unlike term, however, levelizing the premium allows the insurer to “hold down” these rising costs to the policyholder.

    See how expenses start high, then fall, then rise again into the stratosphere? This is the normal trajectory for these costs, which is why levelizing premiums and doing a good job managing the general investment account at the insurer is so important.

    Here is a breakdown of the annual costs by the numbers, as well as the lifetime and 30-year totals (click image to enlarge):

    Total cost of whole life insurance over 76 years is displayed in tabular format.
    Estimated mortality and expense of this policy was reverse engineered by subtracting the policy’s compounding rate from the end-of-year cash value totals, then subtracting out the prior year’s cash value and premium, leaving the M&E. Interest credits were then added back in based on the policy’s dividend attributable to M&E credits. Total net lifetime costs for whole life insurance is $2,765,390.50. The 30-year net cost of whole life insurance is $209,092.16. This is far less than an equivalent term insurance policy + investment fees.

    Mortality and expenses for this policy were calculated based on the following formula:

    Annual Illustrated Costs = (Prior Year-End Cash-Value + Current Premium Paid) – (Current Year-End Cash-Value / (1 + Illustration’s Compounding Rate))

    This formula essentially reverse engineers the internal costs of the policy. Then, dividend credits were added back in.

    Why were dividend credits added back in?

    Well, virtually all whole life insurance dividends incorporate 3 factors.

    The 3-Factor Dividend Model

    1. Morality savings
    2. Expense savings
    3. Investment gain

    The column titled “M&E credits from dividend scale” refers to the portion of the annual dividend that represents mortality and expense savings (Factors #1, and #2). I was able to strip out the investment component of the dividend scale using the insurer’s illustration software and show only the part of the dividend representing M&E credits. These credits are essentially a refund of expenses to the policyholder, which lowers the cost of insurance.

    The first year’s cost is fairly close to the first year’s premium. This is to be expected since the first few years expenses are very large. The capital reserve must be established, plus insurance agent commissions paid, and so on. Although I don’t discuss cash value growth in this analysis, I do want to mention here that these costs are irrespective of the cash value buildup. Some policies with this cost structure have little to no cash value buildup in the first year, while others have high first-year cash surrender value. This particular policy had high early-year cash values.

    Buy Term And Invest The Difference: 30-Year And Total Costs

    Lifetime Costs For Term Life Insurance + Investments

    Summary Of Costs

    • 76-year cost: Between $5,093,306.09 and $10,450,740.64, depending on the rate of return earned and the fees charged
    • 30-year cost: Between $186,274.92 and $307,113.01
    • Commissions and fees paid to life insurance agents and advisors: Between $89,324.73 and $213,107.73

    For term policies, this is relatively straightforward. The cost is the premium. The insurance agent earns a commission on the sale of term insurance, which is a percentage of the premium. The following illustration shows the “all in” costs for 76 years (a lifetime for a 45 year old) of term plus the fees for investing at various growth rates and fee/AUM percentages. 

    The first 30 years of the term policy are level premium years. After the level premium period is over, the policy automatically switches to yearly-renewable, which tops out after 50 years, and terminates (the policyholder is no longer insurable). The investment fees continue for the rest of the policyholder’s life to age 121.

    This long time period was used to match the whole life policy illustration (click image to enlarge).

    A graphical representation of the 76-year cost of term life insurance plus investment management fees.
    The 76-year cost of term insurance, plus investment management, grows each year. There’s a substantial drop in annual costs when the term policy terminates at the maximum insurable age of 95.

    30-Year Cost For Term Insurance + Investments

    Many (but not all) policyholders cancel their 30-year term once the level premium period ends, so it’s helpful to see what those costs look like, too. The above graph shows how the cost remains somewhat modest for the first 30 years, then explodes upwards. The following tabular illustration shows the combined 30-year cost and 76-year cost for term life insurance plus the fees for a hypothetical investment at various growth rates and fee/AUM percentages. The 30-year cumulative total cost is between $186,278.52 and $307,116.61 and depends on the assumed growth rate and fees charged for the investment management.

    30-Year And Lifetime Total Costs For Term Life Insurance And Investment Fees

    (click image to enlarge)

    Illustration showing lifetime costs for term life insurance plus investment management.
    The 76-year cost of term life insurance (30-year term, plus yearly renewable thereafter), plus investment management fees is between $8.7 million and $14.1 million. 30-year cost is between $186,278.52 and $307,116.61 and depends on the assumed growth rate and fees charged for investment management.

    Term Commissions And Investment Management Fees Paid To Life Insurance Agents And Financial Advisors

    A common belief is that commissions on term life insurance and investment management fees are not just less, but much less, than commissions paid on a whole life policy. It is also assumed the high commission rates paid on whole life negatively influence the advice given to clients, with the conclusion being clients should always (or mostly) be advised to buy low-cost term insurance and “invest the difference”. 

    The basis for this recommendation largely hinges on the cost argument.

    This believe is so widespread, few even question it, much less investigate the origin of this claim. The following illustration shows the 30-year cumulative cost for term insurance and investment management, assuming different growth rates and fee structures (click image to enlarge).

    An illustration/tabular values showing commissions paid on term life insurance and investment management for 30 years.
    Commissions for term life insurance and investment management for 30 years are between $89,324.73 and $213,107.73. Exact fees and commissions depend on the growth rate assumed on the investment, plus investment management fee structure. Commission rates for term insurance also vary, but less so than investment fees.

    Commissions were calculated using a standard BGA (Broker General Agent) contract. Fees were determined using the latest research and data from the Investment Company Institute, 401(k) Averages Book (23rd Edition), and data compiled by AdvisoryHQ.

    Commissions and fees vary, but are substantial, even on the low end. In most cases, the cost of whole life insurance is lower than the cost for an equivalent “buy term, invest the difference” strategy for a 45-year old male. Younger ages result in even lower costs for all types of life insurance. Investment management fees are not impacted by age, but rather by duration of the investment (time horizon) and the size of the portfolio.

    Assuming the national average “all in” fee (0.88%) for tax-qualified investment accounts (which includes a low-cost mutual fund), fees for “buy term and invest the difference” should be roughly $90,000 over 30 years.

    The investment fees alone were roughly $87,000 on the low end, with term insurance commissions ranging between $2,316 and $5,261.

    Final Thoughts About The Cost Of Life Insurance vs Investing

    Life insurance and investing serve two different purposes.

    Even within the life insurance product category, different types of life insurance serve different purposes. Some life insurance agents like to say that life insurance only serves one purpose: to protect those you leave behind.

    This is a convenient narrative to sell term policies, which is fine. That’s what term is for—to protect those you leave behind. It’s simple life insurance. That’s just what it is.

    But permanent life insurance serves different purposes. For example, a whole life policy can be set up to provide a death benefit, supplemental savings (via the cash value of the policy), a dedicated line of credit you own and control (via the cash value of the policy), disability benefits, chronic, critical, and terminal illness benefits (i.e. an advancement of the death benefit for various permanent illnesses), and even long-term care insurance (which is similar to health insurance, except that it explicitly pays for long-term care, and other related, expenses which are not covered by normal health insurance policies).

    Basically, permanent insurance can be set up to protect you from a variety of different financial risks instead of just one. And since the policy is permanent, it lasts your entire life and cannot be taken away from you.

    The cost of life insurance coverage for both is high, but understandably so. Providing an insurance guarantee in the event of death costs money—a lot of money. 

    Regardless, investments cannot replicate this function. 

    Likewise, investments serve an important wealth-building function. They cannot replace life insurance, but life insurance also cannot replace investments. Ideally, your policies should protect your income and savings, and give you a solid foundation to build wealth. Your investments should augment your wealth-building ability, whether that’s an investment in a business you own or someone else’s business (i.e. stocks), or some other investment altogether (bonds, real estate, gold, etc.).

    Insurance agents and financial planners (and really, the entire insurance industry) would be better off figuring out how to incorporate investments and life insurance in the same financial plan, rather than pitting one against the other. For decades, both the investment and insurance industry have spent valuable resources tearing each other down. 

    Investment advisors and financial planners accuse both captive agents and independent agents of selling life insurance products (particularly whole life insurance) that are harmful to consumers. Insurance agents, meanwhile, accuse investment advisors of misleading clients about the returns possible with more speculative investments, and potentially losing their client’s money when an investment goes sideways.

    Life insurance companies seem to straddle this issue, by owning both traditional life insurance businesses, and brokerage firms, each simultaneously publishing “hit pieces” about the other side of the business.

    Honestly, none of this is necessary.

    A big part of this battle has been over the costs associated with each strategy. While I did not cover every possible iteration of investing, term, and whole life insurance here, there’s enough information here for you to understand the general principle and relative cost of each strategy. 

    While life insurance products tend to be very expensive over the long-term, whole life is, surprisingly, cheaper in the majority of cases compared to a “buy term and invest the difference” strategy. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t invest your money. It means if you want to use life insurance as a “shield” for your investments, or if there are other reasons you want to remain insured for your entire life, then whole life insurance is (by far) the lower-cost option compared to term.

    Of course, cost alone is not the sole reason to buy or avoid a particular financial product or to adopt or avoid a particular financial strategy. It’s merely one piece of the puzzle.

  • How To Be Your Own Banker: The Simple Version (No Numbers)

    My first piece of advice on this is don’t make this harder than it needs to be.

    Using cash value loans against participating whole life insurance self-finance your business and lifestyle is as old as… well… the life insurance business itself. Look, this is not hard. And yet, the way it’s often explained and implemented leaves people scratching their head (I’m looking at you “IBC practitioners”). Don’t make it hard. Here’s how to keep things simple, while still benefiting from a deceptively powerful financial strategy.

    Setting Up Your Policy

    Setting up your own cash rich whole life insurance policy is a matter of first figuring out what your financing needs are, then solving for those needs with an appropriate amount of whole life insurance. Sometimes this is referred to as a “premium solve”, where a specific amount of premium is used as the basis to figure out how much death benefit can be purchased. Then, an additional amount of premium is added to the policy to “overfund” the policy (technically inaccurate, but whatever), resulting in a high cash value policy. The high cash value allows for generous policy loans.

    Additionally, the life insurance policy should be purchased from a mutual life insurance company, as opposed to a stock (public) company. Mutual insurers are owned by its policyholders, which is important, since it entitles policyholders to both interest and dividends from the insurer.

    Anyway, here are the 5 basic steps you must follow if you want to succeed with this:

    Step 1: Fund Your Whole Life Insurance Policy

    Don’t skimp on this step. I mean it. 

    The number one reason people fail with this strategy is because they’re afraid to capitalize their policy with sufficient premiums. Plan on paying at least 10% of your income into a policy. That’s to get it started. You’ll probably have to increase that amount over time. 

    If that sounds like a lot of money going to the life insurance company, it’s because it is. It’s supposed to be. This is the foundation for everything else you’re doing, so you need to put a lot of money into your policy. You can always borrow against it when you want or need to. But if there’s nothing in there to begin with, there’s not much to work with.

    A lot of people fight this because they’re conditioned to think of insurance as an expense, not an asset. To be successful with this, you have to flip that mentality around. If you’re still having trouble with the idea of paying so much money into a policy, remember this: the whole idea here is that you’re establishing your own personal credit system—a life insurance-linked credit system, where you are the owner, funder, borrower, and customer of your own little policy-based lending system. No banks. No other 3rd parties, other than the life insurance company which you are part owner of. So… the first part of establishing your own system is… you have to build up your system. Part of that system is the life insurance policy.

    So, don’t be afraid to put a lot of money into it. After all this is for you and your family. You are building a system of financial autonomy.

    Step 2: Wait For Capital To Build Up

    This is the “boring” part, and the step everyone wishes they could skip. 

    No one wants to wait. They want to get to the “fun” stuff — borrowing. But, being patient pays off. Your “lending system” is always going to be slow to start. You have to just accept this. The cash value needs maybe 3-5 years to grow before you start borrowing. Technically, you can borrow in the first year (the first month, if you really want to), but it’s not ideal. It’s not how these policies are supposed to work. They’re supposed to “cook” for a few years. I realize this money is burning a hole in your pocket, but being patient will help you tremendously in the long-term. Don’t rush the process. Trust it.

    Step 3: Borrow When Opportunities Arise

    While you’re waiting, you’re going to start seeing a bunch of opportunities pop up. 

    I promise. 

    It will happen. 

    People with money always have opportunities presented to them. They never have to chase them down. I suppose that can be both a good and bad thing. But, let’s assume it’s a good thing for now.

    In Nelson Nash’s book, Becoming Your Own Banker, Nash writes about the many opportunities a person might encounter, from equipment financing to unusual real estate deals to maybe starting a car leasing company to service all the high income doctors and lawyers in town who like to lease a new vehicle every 3 years (gotta keep up appearances, right?).

    Step 4: Repay Your Policy Loan

    Something that never gets talked about enough is repaying policy debt.

    For whatever reason, life insurance agents are in love with the idea that “you don’t have to repay these policy loans!” 

    OK, that’s technically true. You don’t have to repay policy debt, but there’s another side to this. If you don’t repay it, the loan grows. See, the life insurance company ain’t stupid. It wants its money, which is ultimately your money (they owe it to you, which is why they want—to pay off policyholders). If you’re not going to repay policy loans, they’re going to force the payoff by adding the accrued loan interest to the total outstanding policy loan principal at the end of the year. And, when you die, the death benefit is reduced by an amount equal to the outstanding loan principal. 

    Repaying policy loans solves this problem, and it ties in nicely with another of Nelson Nash’s ideas: don’t steal the peas. In other words, imagine you own a grocery store. And in this store, you sell all kinds of stuff—canned peas, for example. Regular customers who come in the front door pick up a can of peas and they pay for it at the checkout. But suppose you, being the owner of the store, take a can of peas for yourself and walk out the back door. You’re essentially stealing from yourself. Maybe you can get away with it now and then. But eventually, you’re going out of business with that kind of behavior. And, even if it doesn’t hurt you in the short-term, it will eventually hurt you. In practical terms, this usually leads to the slow death of your policy.

    It’s the same with policy loans. Don’t steal from yourself. Repay the life insurance loan so they can pay those dividends back to you.

    Step 5: Buy More Life Insurance

    A major part of creating your own policy-based credit system, and becoming your own lender of that system, is expanding your system. I don’t necessarily like the “banking” analogy that Nash and others insist on using, but there is a useful analogy of sorts that I think illustrates the point:

    Unless we’re talking about a lone country bank, when do you ever see a bank that only has one branch office? You don’t. There’s always a dozen or so within so many square miles. And, these days, they not only have physical branches, they have an Internet presence. Meaning, they’re everywhere. 

    Translation: don’t forget to keep buying life insurance policies. No, they’re not banks, and you’re not really “becoming your own banker”, but I think you get the idea. I see so many policyholders buy one policy and call it good. They think this is all they need. Or they get distracted and go do something else.

    No. This is not the way. 

    You stay focused and keep expanding your portfolio of policies to accommodate more and more of your financing needs until the life insurance company refuses to sell you anymore life insurance (and they will, eventually).

    What Is The Infinite Banking Concept®?

    Now that I’ve covered the big picture “how to”, let’s dig a bit deeper into one version of this concept, shall we?

    Nelson Nash may not have invented the idea of borrowing money from life insurance companies, but… he sure as hell did make it sound sexy. According to its discoverer, R. Nelson Nash, The Infinite Banking Concept® is all about “how much of the banking function do you control as it relates to your needs“. The Infinite Banking Concept® was born out of this initial seed idea. Along with this idea, Nelson Nash formulated several other important ideas in his book, one of which was “you finance everything you buy”. You either pay interest to someone else or you lose interest on your savings when you pay cash. 

    Think about that for a moment. You cannot get away from interest cost. You can only run away from an interest payment (i.e. paying interest to someone else). The cost of money follows you around. You’ll always pay it, either out of pocket or as realized opportunity cost. The more you control the all this money in your life, the more opportunity cost you recognize, the more interest you can “recapture” from the system and the better off you are.

    Now… there’s absolutely in Nash’s book that necessitates the reader buy life insurance. Nash insists that it’s all about the process, not the product. And yet… the entire concept is about buying participating whole life insurance. 

    Whatever. Anyway.

    Nash’s correct view about financing everything you buy doesn’t prove that life insurance is a necessary purchase. But… I do think life insurance is a valuable product, regardless of whether or not you use it for self-financing.

    Can You Really Become Your Own Bank?

    No. And, this is where I diverge from the gooroos promoting this concept. You will never be a bank unless you —wait for it— start a bank, and make the business highly transactional.

    With that said, you can build, own, and control your own personal credit in the form of life insurance (crazy, I know), use that insurance as a way to finance things you want through policy loans, and then profit from those borrowing activities.

    The life insurance industry refuses to acknowledge The Infinite Banking Concept® as an official way to use life insurance. Unofficially, however, I’ve spoken to lots of General Agents and even folks at the home office who say they really like the idea. The entire financial world is built around the idea of retirement planning, and here’s this idea which runs contrary to the mainstream way of doing things. It’s a very creative use of life insurance, doesn’t really hurt the insurance industry or life insurance companies when implemented responsibly, it’s not in any way illegal or immoral, and it empowers the policyholders and gives them more control over their money. 

    Everyone wins.

    At the same time, a lot of so called financial experts poo-poo this idea, which I think only helps make it more popular with folks who’ve been burned (usually more than once) by the financial industry and by financial planners (especially the full-of-themselves, narcissistic, “award winning” types). In my humble (but honest) opinion, a big reason why your typical financial professional doesn’t like IBC is because the policyholder remains in control of his money, not the financial professional. There’s a sort of role-reversal there. 

    Many (most?) financial planners love a top-down approach to financial planning. They want more regulatory control over the financial industry (to “raise the bar” and keep competition down), and specifically the financial planning industry. They are in love with their credentials and the prestige of it all. 

    The Infinite Banking Concept® is antithetical to that business model because it brings everything down to the “you-and-me” level.

    Usually, with traditional financial planning, the client hands over all money and control to the financial planner, who does “top down” advice giving and planning. With IBC, the policyholder is in control and the financial professional is more like a consultant—very much a “bottom up” approach.

    Why Would You Want To Become The Bank?

    People hate banks, so why would you want to become one? 

    Well, technically, you’re not becoming one. You are acting like one, though, in the sense that you’re borrowing money and managing the loans. Difference is, you’re acting as both the banker and the borrower. You are, in fact, a policy owner (policyholder) and thus… the owner of all the capital and credit inside the policy, the death benefit, and part owner of the company you purchased the policy from (assuming you bought from a mutual company).

    This is an easy concept to understand, but a difficult one for a lot of folks to wrap their head around. 

    Normally, you pay interest to a bank or lender you don’t have any ownership interest in. That bank then takes that interest and distributes it to its real owners—the stockholders. Now, instead of playing that game, what if you cut out the 3rd party bank and used your own company (or a company you had an ownership stake in)? Instead of the shareholders earning all the interest and dividends, that money would be sent to you. You’d be the one profiting.

    Bam. 

    There you go. That’s why you’d want to do this. When you buy a whole life policy, you become part owner of the mutual insurance company, and are thus entitled to both the interest earned from investments plus any share of the business’s profits (dividends). Dividends on whole life policies are paid meritoriously, meaning the more insurance you own, the more premium you pay, the more dividends you can potentially earn.

    And, on the borrowing side of things, policy loans are more efficient and, almost always, a lower cost way of borrowing money compared to traditional loans.

    How Much Money Do You Need To Start A Whole Life Policy?

    People who have never bought life insurance before understandably don’t know how much they should be putting into a policy. Don’t overcomplicate this. Treat your whole life insurance policy like you would any other asset or savings account (even though it’s not a savings account). 

    There are two things to keep in mind when funding a policy…

    1. Deciding On A Dollar Amount

    Your initial premium should be something you can comfortably afford. Ideally, this will be 10% of your net income, but if you feel you can do more, then do it. Most insurance companies will allow you to pay up to 25% of your income into a policy without additional underwriting. Some have hard limits on the percentage of income you can put into a policy.

    2. The Option To Change Premium Payments

    If your policy is designed to be flexible, you won’t be locked into that initial premium forever. You might be able to increase that premium or add one-off (unscheduled) payments now and then. And you definitely should be able to lower the amount when needed (e.g. when repaying policy loans).

    Bottom line: The policy should be flexible enough for you to add money to it within a specified range, rather than a fixed amount that can never be changed.

    Some Final Thoughts

    I get that this isn’t for everyone. Some people won’t be able to afford the relatively high premiums required. Others simply don’t like whole life insurance for one reason or another. And, even if you really like the idea and can afford it, it still might not be the right thing for you to do. 

    A couple of “for instances” for you:

    1. Smokers;
    2. People with more serious health problems; or,
    3. Anybody who would be rated substandard might not like the way their whole life insurance plan performs. 

    I’ve seen some illustrations where the substandard rating is so bad, the policy never generates a positive IRR on cash value, ever. In those cases, whole life insurance isn’t the answer unless you want a permanent death benefit.

    Or, if your time horizon is less than 10 years, this concept probably won’t work well for you.

    Really, you need to think long-range, have the ability to make payments for decades, and be willing to enter a whole new world where retirement is not the norm, and where you become personally responsible for all your own financing needs.

    It’s a tall order. And, frankly, an order many people aren’t ready for.

    This whole new world is scary for a lot of folks. And for some, it might be a bad idea. But, for the right person, it might be just what they’re looking for.

  • Some Downsides To The Infinite Banking Concept

    Anyone who has ever had to deal with an incompetent loan officer asking for the same paperwork 6 different times within the span of a week probably sees at least the general value in not having to interact with these idiots.

    Enter the Infinite Banking Concept (IBC).

    The infinite banking financial strategy is all about “controlling the banking function in your life” using a specially-designed dividend paying whole life insurance policy (a type of permanent life insurance policy with both a death benefit and cash value component), so you don’t have to rely on 3rd-party lenders or traditional loans for financing. 

    You pay premiums into a whole life policy, cash value builds up inside the policy on a tax free basis, and when there’s sufficient cash value in your “infinite banking policy”, you either surrender some of the paid-up additions or take a policy loan to buy whatever you need. Policy loans are the preferred method, but the classic Becoming Your Own Banker book by R. Nelson Nash (2000) actually showed some policy illustrations using withdrawals for “banking” instead of loans.

    Regardless, your infinite banking agent is almost certainly going to tell you to use policy loans instead of partial surrenders, and for the most part, that’s good advice. When you repay your policy loan, you’re repaying the insurance company—an entity you have partial ownership stake in through the policy itself. So, as a borrower, you get the benefits of borrowing from a company you “own” and then as part owner of the company, you collect the profits that normally would go to the stockholder of a public company.

    You’re essentially sitting on both sides of the table. Win-win.

    What’s not to love?

    A few things… maybe. Here are the disadvantages of infinite banking as I see it…

    Whole Life Policies Require High Premiums

    The only way infinite banking works is if you pay a lot of premium to the life insurance company.

    It’s not uncommon to start infinite banking with $20,000-$50,000 (or more) per year in premium. Most of this premium ends up as cash value in the first year of the policy, so it’s ultimately coming back to you. But it has to go in there first. You cannot thin-fund your policy. That’s not how infinite banking works. Most infinite banking pros will want to see at least 10% of your annual income going into a policy. 

    Of course, not all policies are funded with tens of thousands of dollars every year. Some policies can be funded with a mere $5,000 annually. But, you’ll rarely see illustrations less than $10,000/yr these days. 

    Some policies are funded with a large lump sum amount, plus a smaller monthly premium payment. It just depends on what the policyholder is starting with, and what they can afford. If you’re not going to pay premiums of $5,000-$10,000 per year, for example, you’ll probably have to start with a large lump sum amount to get your policy started.

    Basically, you have to be “bought in” on the whole infinite banking concept. You can’t half-ass it. And if you do, God help you. You’re not going to like the end-result. The infinite banking system hinges on making these high premiums for decades on end. This is how you build up your capital surplus and “become your own banker” (BYOB). You’re not going to BYOB with no “B”.

    In fact, this was a core tenet in Nash’s book—’Don’t be afraid to capitalize’. Not everyone likes the idea of saving up this much money. It’s weird, but I get it. I don’t agree with it, but I get it. Still, the only way the infinite banking concept works is for you to be a serious saver. There’s just no way around it.

    Cash Value Growth Can Be Slow

    Cash value growth inside a whole life insurance policy, even one designed for infinite banking, can be slow. This is especially true of the guaranteed growth part of the policy’s cash value, which is why your life insurance agent will use a paid-up additions rider (PUA rider) on your policy. The goal of the PUA rider is to help accelerate your policy’s cash value growth, but it can only do so much. “Accelerate” does not mean “instant”, and I think a lot of people get disappointed when their policy’s cash value doesn’t grow as fast as they want it to, even with a healthy PUA payment. 

    I’ve seen more than a few folks get frustrated by this. Even after having “the talk” about patience and how it pays off, they eventually get mad and quit.

    It can take several years for the total premiums you pay to equal the total net cash value of your policy (often referred to as the “break even point”). “Break even” might take between 4-5 years, but could also take between 6-9 years, depending on the company, policy, and how the infinite banking policy was designed. 

    Some whole life insurance policies have suppressed guaranteed cash value growth in the early years so the insurer can boost the dividend payout later, thus optimizing long-term cash value accumulation. If you have a policy from a company that does this, you have to be even more patient for the payoff. 

    Often, high early-year cash value growth comes at the price of long-term policy performance, and can even cause policies to MEC later on due to the excessive “forced premium”. Early “break even” points might also reduce the ability to put in premiums later on or cause a slowdown in cash value growth later on. So, if you’re impatient, you’re hit on the back end of the policy’s cash value growth curve, which can also be very frustrating.

    End of the day, cash value growth can be very slow in any infinite banking policy your agent designs for you. The point here is cash value is supposed to grow slowly and steadily. If that bothers you, you’re going to be very frustrated holding this policy for decades.

    Poor Customer Service From The Life Insurance Company

    Customer service is very much hit or miss at the life insurers these days.

    Let’s face it, it’s an entry-level job and the insurance companies don’t always hire the cream of the crop here. They’re not criminals or anything, but they aren’t always the most helpful folks you’ll encounter. And, even when you’re dealing with a reasonably intelligent, normally-adjusted, human being, keep in mind the dude taking your call at 4PM on a Friday afternoon ain’t interested in what you want from your whole life insurance policy. He just wants to clock out in an hour, go to the bar, and “unwind” from a tough week of being beat up on the phone by serial complainers.

    Now, don’t get me wrong. I’ve worked with some absolutely amazing customer service people. People who—frankly—deserve more pay and a better job title for what they do. But… many (most?) of the service folks you’ll encounter aren’t infinite banking experts. Just something to keep in mind.

    Infinite Banking Involves Loans

    Infinite banking emphasizes the use of policy loans. Some people don’t like paying interest, even if it’s to themselves or a company they have ownership rights in. While the loans are tax free (a point IBC practitioners are quick to point out), they also accrue interest which must be paid every year. If you don’t pay the interest on the policy loan, the interest gets added to the loan principal and the loan starts to compound against you.

    Very bad.

    Lapsed Life Insurance Policies Kill Tax Benefits

    If you overloan any of your policies, or there’s not enough cash value in your whole life insurance policy to keep it in force using the automatic premium loan feature, it will lapse. If your policy lapses, you’ll lose your policy’s tax free benefits, and you’ll owe income tax on all the gains realized in the policy.

    Life Insurance Policy Loans Reduce Your Death Benefit

    Even if your whole life insurance policy doesn’t lapse due to loan activity, every policy loan reduces the death benefit by an amount equal to the loan until the loan is repaid. If you repay the loan, the death benefit is restored. However, if you don’t pay the loan back, the amount will be deducted from the death benefit when you die.

    You Might Not Qualify For An Infinite Banking Policy

    Qualifying for a new whole life insurance policy may be difficult for older individuals, those who smoke, or those in poor health. Although your agent might describe it as “being your own bank”, the reality is the insurer views it as a permanent life insurance policy, and all insurance policies require you to pass both medical and financial underwriting. 

    If you can’t get through underwriting, you don’t get a policy. End of story.

    You Might MEC Your Whole Life Insurance Policy By Taking Loans

    It’s rare, but I’ve seen it happen where very large policy loans taken too early on in the contract cause the policy to MEC.

    It happens as a result of a sudden change in the ratio between the life insurance cash value build-up, death benefit, and premiums paid. If a loan causes your policy to MEC, you’ll lose virtually all the advertised tax benefits, including the tax free access to cash values. You won’t lose the tax deferred growth of the policy, but the IRS will reclassify your policy as a “modified endowment contract”, and treat it like a more traditional investment, applying the rules than normally apply to retirement and other tax advantaged accounts.

    Most people don’t want this to happen to their policy. It sucks, and virtually destroys your ability to use your policy as an emergency fund (since you’ve lost tax free access to the cash value) or in any other meaningful or practical way for infinite banking.

    Cash Value Withdrawals Can Also MEC Your Infinite Banking Policy

    In Nash’s first book, some of the illustrations he included show a withdrawal of cash value from a whole life insurance policy, not a loan. 

    Thing is, it’s probably easier to MEC your infinite banking policy with cash value withdrawals (partial surrenders) than with loans because the partial surrender permanently reduces the death benefit of your policy. Withdrawals made earlier on in the life of the policy are riskier than withdrawals made later on in the life of the policy.

    And just like with MEC’ing your policy with loans, you’ll also lose most of the policy’s tax advantages, including the tax free policy loans your policy if you MEC it by taking too many withdrawals (or excessively large withdrawals) early on.

    The Infinite Banking Strategy Requires Long-Term Thinking And Planning

    I know this sounds like a weird “disadvantage”, but some people haven’t developed a long-term mindset. These people are functionally children. So, pretty much anything that requires long-term thinking and planning is endlessly frustrating to them. 

    Childish, I realize. But it is what it is. 

    Really, it amazes me how many people think 5 years is “long-term”. You need to think longer. How long? Try, your entire life. Average life expectancy at birth for both men and women is between 70-80 years. Obviously, if you live to age 80, you’re going to live longer.

    Point is, you’re not buying a whole life policy for 5 years. You’re buying it for—wait for it—your whole life. If you’re not really sure you want to own a policy for the rest of your life, might not be something you want to get involved in.

    It Requires A Complete Shift In Your Thinking And Attitude

    People are trained and conditioned to be followers from a very young age. They’re taught to obey authority, stop questioning authority figures, and fall in line with the “mainstream”. Once this attitude, behavior, and habits are established, it’s very difficult for a person to change. Yet, this change is necessary for you to be successful with the infinite banking strategy.

    Infinite banking is not just a product, and it’s not just something you do occasionally, for fun. You basically have to overhaul your entire approach to money. A lot of people simply don’t want to do that, and don’t like the changes that must be made for infinite banking to work.

    You Might Be Joining A Cult

    As much as your authorized infinite banking insurance agent doesn’t want to admit it, “The Nelson Nash Institute” has become, well… an institution. Back when it was the Infinite Banking Institute, it was a bit more acceptable. The focus was on the idea. Now, the focus is mostly on what Nash said, what Nash did. It’s very much become a “What Would Nash Do?” (WWND) groupthink type of organization.

    This sort of thing tends to kill innovation and causes stagnation, which (in my opinion) is exactly what’s happened. It also leads to odd consensus-like statements and viewpoints about how infinite banking should be done, and how it shouldn’t be done, policy design “rules” and so on.

    Self-Insuring Is Probably A Bad Idea

    A section of the Becoming Your Own Banker book delves into the idea of self-insuring for certain kinds of insurance—auto comprehensive and collision. This always struck me as a bit off course because the infinite banking book is about becoming your own banker, not becoming your own insurance company. 

    Self-insuring requires some special risk management chops and for most people, in most situations, it’s best to just let the insurer handle comp and collision. Not saying it can’t work, but for most people it’s going to be a bad idea.

    It’s Not A True Emergency Fund

    An emergency fund is money you can access immediately. Life insurance cash value takes some time to get access to—typically 3-5 business days. Don’t get me wrong. It’s an excellent backstop for a saving’s account or maybe even a credit card. And, if you need large sums of money for unplanned non-emergency type stuff, then it works great.

    But if you get into a car accident and need a tow, or your pipes burst during a hard freeze in the middle of winter, or if you need money to bail out your buddy or something, you’re better off using cash savings or a credit card.

    You Cannot Buy Unlimited Amounts Of Life Insurance On Your Kids Or Other People

    No. Just, no. 

    This doesn’t work. 

    And in the circumstances when it does work, it’s rather limited. 

    Life insurers don’t want you buying a bunch of life insurance on other people before you’ve fully insured yourself. And even when you’ve bought enough life insurance on yourself, they still don’t want you to buy a bunch of life insurance on other people. And if you manage to convince an underwriter to underwrite your children, here’s the deal: the death benefit limit on your children generally must be 75% or less of whatever death benefit coverage you have on yourself.

    If you can’t buy insurance on yourself because of health reasons, well then that’s just how the cookie crumbles. 

    Insurers generally prohibit buying insurance on strangers and most other people outside your immediate family or business relationships (spouse, children, business partners, etc.). Remember, this is not a “bank” from the insurer’s point of view. To them, it’s a death benefit, and they don’t want the inherent risk of stranger-owned life insurance on their books.

    Premiums Cannot Equal Income – You Cannot Treat It Like It’s Your Own Bank

    One of the ideas some agents still push is buying so many infinite banking policies that your premiums will equal your income. At that point, the policy’s dividends become your new source of income. 

    While there are probably ways to pull this off in your old age, most life insurers will not allow you to pay more than a certain percentage of your income into a life insurance policy because… as far as they’re concerned, this is still life insurance, not a savings account or a bank account of any kind. A real savings account you can slosh money into and out of. Banks generally don’t have restrictions about how much of your income you put in there. 

    Life insurers do.

    Repeat after me: whole life insurance is not a bank.

    Non-Direct Recognition Is Oversold

    The infinite banking die-hards still insist that non-direct recognition loans are a requirement to practice the infinite banking concept. They’ll also tell you non-direct recognition “works better” because the insurer doesn’t change your dividend when you take policy loans. 

    I’ve written about this elsewhere, but the long-and-short of it is both non-direct recognition and direct recognition loans work fine. Non-direct recognition policies are subsidized, which is how the insurer can afford to pay the same dividend regardless of loan activity (which the IBC practitioners deny, but which is a well-established fact in the insurance industry, and which can be easily verified by examining any insurer’s financial statements). The subsidy results in an effective spread being worked into the dividend rate, which lowers everyone’s dividend to give the appearance (illusion?) that you’re getting something for nothing.

    But there’s no free lunch. Every Austrian economist knows this.

    Infinite Banking Doesn’t Replace Investing

    If what you really want is a way to invest your money, infinite banking isn’t for you. Life insurance isn’t an investment. It’s a financial product that helps you manage a variety of different financial risks. In the context of the infinite banking concept, your whole life policy is solving for the financial risk of not having enough capital and not having access to credit when you need it.

    The Infinite Banking Concept Can Be Alienating

    The infinite banking concept can be quite alienating. 

    First of all, you’re funneling an inordinate amount of your cash flow into a life insurance policy. Most of your peers won’t understand how life insurance cash value works, so they’re going to see this as an oddball move. Most personal finance goo-ruse don’t like the infinite banking concept, either. They’re addicted to traditional/mainstream retirement planning. Anything that deviates from that is “weird”, or more likely, “wrong”.

    Another thing is, all your friends and family have been told by the personal finance industry that whole life insurance is a scam, so… strike two. You’re not going to get any support from your usual support structure.

    On top of this, you’re self-financing everything you buy. This is abnormal to a lot of people. Most people use credit cards, personal loans, auto loans, and mortgages, to buy stuff, not cash value from a life insurance policy. If they buy life insurance at all, it’s term life insurance. That’s what they’ve been told to buy. They also go deep into debt, and spend years—sometimes decades—digging themselves out of debt. They keep up with the Joneses, and are always leasing new cars, living beyond their means. 

    You can’t do that with infinite banking, so you’re going to be the boring friend or family member who can never afford to do “fun stuff”.

    You Might Drive Your Spouse Crazy

    … and if you have a normie spouse who likes to spend money all the time, you’re going to drive them crazy, too. Even if they’re not a spendthrift you might still drive them crazy. The whole idea of building up cash value and then borrowing against it will sound like some sort of strange Rube Goldberg machine to them. 

    They’re also going to think (and be told) anyone promoting this alienating sort of lifestyle is harmful to your traditional support structure, driving a wedge between you and “normal society”, and is probably not giving you good financial advice.

    It’s a lot to battle.

    A client once told me his wife thought he was insane buying so many whole life insurance policies. She didn’t understand how the cash value in those policies worked. All she saw were these large premium bills from the insurance company and she saw them as an expense, not as cash value savings. So, as a result, she believed they were “insurance poor”, even though her husband’s policies have millions of dollars worth of cash value in them, and the policies themselves generate enough dividend income to pay for just about any lifestyle she could possibly want.

    Yet she still believes, for whatever reason, they’d be better off with term life insurance and some money stuffed into a savings account.

    You Might Drive Your Accountant/Financial Advisor Crazy

    Most accountants push tax-advantaged qualified retirement plans as a “tax planning” strategy. A lot of them don’t “get” the logic of infinite banking. They might understand how cash value is an asset, but they’re not going to understand the logic behind using it.

    Weird, but true.

    If your accountant has a more traditional mindset, be prepared to fight with him every year about your infinite banking system.

    You Might Not Have The Time To Manage Your Life Insurance Policy Loans

    While you don’t have to actively manage the cash value in your policy, you do have to keep tabs on any loans you take, and be diligent about repaying them. Staying organized is key. Usually, all it takes is a spreadsheet and some basic math to calculate how much to repay those loans with.

    But, I get it. Not everyone wants to do that. 

    And, if you’re taking multiple loans, and truly being your own “banker”, you’re going to spend a fair amount of time managing policy loans and tracking repayments, optimizing things, and so on. I’m not saying it will take over your life, but there are going to be times when you’re spending an evening (maybe even a Friday night—GASP!) poring over spreadsheets. Just a heads up.

    You Might End Up With The Wrong Whole Life Insurance Policy Design

    There are basically four different ways an insurance agent can design your policy. The wrong policy design might leave you with a policy you don’t want, or can’t use, or one that causes tax or other problems later on down the road.

    Here are a few basic ways to design whole life policies:

    All base premium – This is not an infinite banking life insurance policy. This is more like a traditional life insurance policy with low or zero early-year cash value. Life insurance policies with zero cash value in the early years aren’t usually the type of policy design that’s associated with infinite banking. Don’t get me wrong. A traditional whole life policy can work just fine once there’s cash value in there. But it’s not the typical infinite banking design.

    A 90/10 design – This is becoming more and more popular and I don’t know why, really. The 90/10 split means 90% of your premium dollars are being shuttled into a term rider or paid-up additions rider, and the remaining 10% of your premium goes to the base premium. I guess newbie policyholders love it because it shows very high early-year cash values, and the “break even” point comes on in years 3-5.

    However, long-term cash value performance tends to suffer, as does the ability to put in premium dollars down the road. The other thing I don’t personally like about this approach is there’s entirely too much focus on the illustration and illustrated performance.

    Any whole life policy designed for short-term cash value accumulation tends to be the worst long-term performers. Keep that in mind. Unfortunately, these short-term policy designs also tend to be the most common because insurance agents are selling the illustrated rates of the policy, and gearing their marketing to consumers who are accustomed to thinking about investments in the short-term.

    You Might End Up With The Wrong Cash Value Life Insurance Policy

    There are many different types of permanent life insurance and cash value life insurance on the market that aren’t whole life insurance. In fact, whenever an agent uses terms like “cash value life insurance” or even just “permanent life insurance”, just assume it’s some type of universal life insurance, because it almost certainly is. Those are cue words. All these nondescript life policies imply a UL chassis. They usually won’t come right out and say it. But, most of the time, that’s what it is.

    “Permanent life insurance” has become synonymous with universal life insurance or indexed universal life sold by stock life insurers. These permanent life insurance policies are, in fact, a combination of term life insurance and a cash value account. It’s a clever way to imply you’re getting a whole life policy without actually giving you a whole life policy, because they superficially look like whole life insurance.

    Your policy’s cash grows tax-deferred. You get tax free withdrawals and loans. On the surface of it, it feels just like a whole life policy. But, there’s no guaranteed growth and the insurer can change the internal costs of the policy as and when they need (or want) to. 

    Bottom line is everyone in the industry knows whole life is the gold standard. That’s why everyone likes to pretend every other type of cash value life insurance is whole life insurance. 

    And if you can make a permanent life insurance policy sound like whole life, while still technically telling the truth about what you’re offering (the best kind of truth, amirite?), well then… at least 2 out of 3 people will be happy about it— the agent and the insurer.

    Your Life Insurance Company Might Discourage You From Using The Infinite Banking Concept

    MassMutual, and some other companies don’t really like agents selling infinite banking life insurance policies, are threatening to cancel agent contracts if they do, and are even going so far as to discourage policyholders from utilizing their policies for “infinite banking”.

    Now, they can’t prevent you from borrowing money against your policy. They can’t tell you what to do with your policy, or cancel your policy, but they can’t strongly discourage you from using it to its full effect. How? Simple. By delaying policy loan requests, drag out the disbursement, “accidentally” misallocating policy loan repayments, and so on.

    Now, not all companies are like this. Some companies welcome the infinite banking concept with open arms, will process your policy loan quickly and efficiently, and won’t create problems for you. But, if you choose the wrong company, you’ll be making it harder on yourself.

    Final Thoughts About The Infinite Banking Concept

    Is infinite banking legitimate?

    Yes. 

    Does infinite banking work as advertised?

    Essentially, yes. Infinite banking works as advertised.

    Are there risks with using an infinite banking insurance policy?

    Most definitely.

    Infinite banking requires the policyholder to be more financially responsible and aware than your average Boobus Americanus. This is big boy/girl stuff. Not for people playing pretend. I mean that. You cannot be a financially irresponsible person and use the infinite banking strategy. It simply will not work. 

    Furthermore, you must have an above-average understanding of life insurance, whole life insurance in particular, and a deeper understanding of how loans and loan amortization works. Plus, you need to have the sticktoitiveness, gumption, and that Rogue Spirit Americans used to be known for. It also helps to have a good head on your shoulders and the ability to be patient.

    Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on who you ask), life insurance products today are sold as commodities, and so few people give it the deep thought and attention required to make it really work for them. These products are not mutual funds or retirement accounts, and (in spite of what some of the marketers/promoters tell you) it’s not a bank account or personal bank. Policy loans are not like traditional loans, and your typical financial advisor will probably advise you against doing this (or anything like this) with your money. In fact, the entire personal finance industry is likely going to mock and ridicule you for even thinking about the infinite banking concept.

    In that sense, you’re on your own.

    With all these cons of infinite banking, why bother with it? 

    Great question.

    Maybe you shouldn’t.

    Look, I’m not going to sit here and pretend that everyone thinks like me. I know they don’t. Personally, I believe everyone can benefit from implementing infinite banking in some way, shape, or form. But, not everyone is in the right frame of mind right now to implement it. I’d go so far as to argue many folks probably need some serious introspection time to sort out personal hangups they have about money.

    Anyway, if you’ve made it this far, and still want to know how to implement infinite banking for yourself and your family, go sign up to my email list and read my exclusive daily emails that I never publish to the blog. When you sign up to my email list, you also get free access to The Monegenix App (where I go into even more detail about life insurance and infinite banking).

  • How To Do Infinite Banking On A Budget

    Infinite Banking policies are premium hungry.

    To make this strategy work well, you kinda-sorta have to commit to substantial premiums for many years (think a decade or longer). But what if you don’t have a lot of extra income at the end of the month? How will you fund your infinite banking policy (assuming this is a top priority for you)? 

    Time to get creative.

    10 Ways To Save Money For Your Infinite Banking Policy

    #1: Pay Off Nagging Debts To Fund Your Infinite Banking Policy

    If you have a bunch of niggling little debts sucking up all your monthly income, time to pay off those debts. They’re clearly getting in your way of saving money. Infinite banking, and really, any cash value life insurance policy, requires substantial, ongoing premium payments——especially in the early years of the policy. Without these early premium payments, the policy will collapse on itself.

    Think of this like starting a new business. These policies are very capital intensive. The more you’re burdened by debt, the less financial stable you are. Get rid of the debts, and fund your policy.

    #2: Use Cash Back Rewards To Fund Your Infinite Banking Policy

    I wrote extensively about cash back rewards in my book, The 10-Minute Budget. The short version is, if you can sign up for several credit cards with generous sign-up bonuses, plus cash back rewards, you can easily generate between $1,500 and $10,000 per year in extra cash savings. 

    I know I just told you to pay off nagging debt. The credit card strategy can (ironically) help you pay off that debt, but it can also help you kickstart your savings, which can then be put into an infinite banking policy. 

    They key to this strategy is to use the credit cards to pay for bills you’re already paying right now. For example, did you know you can pay your taxes using a credit card?

    You can.

    You can also prepay many utilities with a credit card. There are even special services that allow you to pay your mortgage and rent payments with a credit card, insurance premiums, and other bills that you otherwise cannot pay by credit. You pay be charged a fee for this service, but if the sign-up bonus and cash back rewards are generous, it will easily be worth the fee and net you a tidy sum of money.

    For example, it’s not unusual for folks to pay 2-3% in fees just to pay their bills via credit cards, but then turn around an net between 5-7% cash back from their credit cards (when done properly according to the strategies outlined in my book). Add in the sign-up bonuses, which can range from $500 to $1,000 or more and you can easily make many thousands of extra dollars each year.

    And, as long as you’re paying your bills with this money, the cash back rewards and sign-up bonuses are tax-free (at the time of this writing).

    #3: Use Rebate Sites In Conjunction With Credit Cards To Fund Your Infinite Banking Policy

    Take the above credit card strat, and add rebate sites to the mix. Here’s a few examples of what I mean:

    • Top Cash Back
    • Rakuten
    • BeFrugal
    • Upside
    • Ibotta

    These aren’t recommendations. They’re examples. 

    Each cash back website is going to cater to a certain demographic, or specialize in certain kinds of shopping or shopping experiences. For example, Upside is great for food, gas, and groceries. There’s some limitations with the app, but if you shop with their partner stores, you can save a lot of money every year. 

    If you want to know which cash back websites will be best for you, you’re going to have to use a comparison website. The big picture here is to use your cash back card when shopping these websites, and start stacking rewards. Then, cash those rewards in to either pay off your nagging debts or start funding your infinite banking policy. 

    This strategy works best when you’re shopping for stuff you have to buy anyway, like food, gas, and so on.

    #4: Liquidate Savings Accounts, Bank CDs, Money Markets, and Other Low-Yielding Assets To Fund Your Infinite Banking Policy

    Liquidating your savings account is an easy way to fund an infinite banking policy.

    I hate the often excessive focus on “rate of return”, but even if that’s your primary concern (which it shouldn’t be), the rate of return on an infinite banking policy is excellent, so why keep long-term savings in short-term investments and accounts?

    It just doesn’t make sense. Ditch lower-yielding accounts, and consider liquidating your other accounts, like money markets, bank CDs, and other low-yielding assets. Put this money into a high cash value infinite banking policy instead. 

    If it’s a sizable sum, you won’t be able to stuff it all into a whole life policy in the first year. Instead, you might have to use a premium deposit fund or a special annuity contract to pre-fund your infinite banking policy over several years.

    #5: Refinance And Consolidate High Interest Debts To Fund Your Infinite Banking Policy

    This option isn’t quite as attractive as it once was due to the sky-high rates we’re currently experiencing, but when rates fall again (and they will, eventually), consider refinancing high-interest debts. 

    Even today, though, I think there are some instances where refinancing or consolidating debts to fund your infinite banking policy makes sense. Think 24% APR credit cards. Those can potentially be refinanced into a lower rate using a HELOC or something similar. Even an 8% line of credit is going to be better than paying interest on a credit card.

    #6: Increase Income To Fund Your Infinite Banking Policy

    I don’t know why so many people overlook this one, but just increasing your income will solve a lot of problems and can paper over a lot of financial mistakes. 

    Whether that’s getting a second job, or picking up a side hustle, or starting a small business on the side, more income means more money you have to fund a life insurance policy.

    #7: Make A Spending Priority List To Fund Your Infinite Banking Policy

    A technique I learned for prioritizing important things in my life involves making a list—three lists, actually. The first list is a list of “essentials” or “must haves”. These are things you can’t live without. 

    This list has a tendency to become inflated, which is why you make a second list called “negotiables”. These are things in your life you really like, but don’t absolutely have to have. You could take them or leave them. If you’re being honest with yourself, this list will probably be your longest list.

    Next is your “don’t need” list. These are things in your life that you’re better off without. Again, if you’re being honest with yourself, this list will be pretty long. It might include a bunch of stuff that initially seems fun and exciting. Long-term, these are things that undermine your happiness, health, and overall wellbeing. 

    I’m sure you know what I mean.

    Getting rid of the “dead weight” in your life is a great way to free up both time and money so you can make a new life and start funding your infinite banking policy.

    #8: Hunt For Deals To Fund Your Infinite Banking Policy

    This takes some creativity.

    There are usually several different avenues to get what you want. The easiest, most convenient, most straightforward avenue is also usually the most expensive.

    So, be willing to go out of your way to save money on things you either must have and even for some of the things on your “negotiables” list.

    #9: Use The 10% Rule To Fund Your Infinite Banking Policy

    Before you spend any money on anything (even bills), set aside 10% for yourself. That’s money that will go into your life insurance policy. 

    Yes, I realize this is easier said than done. But, it’s simple. It’s probably the simplest way in this list to start saving money.

    #10: Invent Your Own Money Saving Ideas To Fund Your Infinite Banking Policy

    Years ago, I wrote a book titled, Business Economizer. In that book, I write about an exercise you can do at home to build up your brain power and force yourself to become more creative. 

    Creativity is a skill. 

    You can learn it, and if you need more money so you can start your infinite banking policy, then I’d argue you need this skill. 

    Anyway, this exercise allows you to invent your own money-saving ideas. The more you use this exercise, the more creative money saving ideas you’ll come up with.

    Budgeting For Infinite Banking

    Nothing happens without a budget. So, build your insurance premium right into your monthly budget, and it’ll become just like any other bill you have to pay.

    Here’s some very basic things to think about when budgeting for a new insurance premium:

    1. Set a realistic budget for an Infinite Banking Policy. Don’t get yourself in over your head. Most policies can be built around any arbitrary number. If you absolutely need a hard number, go with 10% of your net income.
    2. Always fund your budget each month with your W-2 or business income. Funding your budget with cash, as you earn it, is the simplest way to make sure those premiums (and everything else) gets paid for, on time.
    3. Revise your budget to cut expenses you don’t need, or that are contradictory or counterproductive to your long-term financial goals.

    Use Waiver Of Premium Rider On Your Infinite Banking Policy

    Waiver of premium rider is a special rider that waives the premium on your policy when you’re disabled. Before you can take advantage of this rider, you:

    1. Must be disabled (duh) and;
    2. Must meet the other conditions of the rider. Usually, this includes having a licensed doctor affirm you are disabled and then waiting out the black-out period for the rider before it kicks in (i.e. several months). Some insurance companies also have a waiting period that applies to the use of the rider, meaning you might have to wait a year (or longer) before the rider can be activated or used at all.

    But, if you’re disabled, and cannot afford to pay your infinite banking policy premiums, this might be an option for you. 

    Another option is obviously disability insurance, but that’s a bit more of a financial commitment.

    Use Premium Offset or Alternate Pay Options For Your Infinite Banking Policy When You Have Low Funds

    Using premium offset on your infinite banking policy might also help if you’re having trouble paying premiums. Premium offset or “alternate pay option” is when the insurance company uses a combination of your current dividends and paid-up additions to pay the current base premium due. 

    By doing this, you’re essentially taking from the left hand and put it in the right hand, but at the same time it’s meeting the required premium payment for the policy. 

    This option is sometimes used when a policyholder takes out a policy loan, and cannot afford to keep paying for the monthly premium while the loan is outstanding. There’s only so much money to go around, after all. So, making both the loan payment and the normal premium payment might be out of the question. 

    Premium offset solves this problem.

    Apply For A Better Rate Class On Your Infinite Banking Policy

    If you have a substandard rating on your policy, you might be able to get a better rating. 

    Might.

    It all depends on the reason for the substandard rating. 

    Some ratings are simple to change (in theory). For example, if you were a smoker but quit (for at least a year), many insurance companies will rerate you as a non-smoker. Some insurers want to see 2 years nicotine-free before they’ll re-rate you as a non-smoker. Getting your smoker’s rating removed from your policy will save you a truly ridiculous amount of money, and is an easy win——you’re healthier and you save a buttload of money on premiums.

    If you initially got a substandard rating due to “build” (too heavy for your height) and you lost a significant amount of weight, you might qualify for a standard or better rating now. This can save you a substantial amount of money in most cases.

    Use A Blended Whole Life Policy For Infinite Banking

    A blended whole life policy is where the agent blends term insurance into the base whole life policy. It’s a sort of hybrid whole life policy.

    These policies have lower required (guaranteed) premiums, and tend to have higher paid-up additions rider (optional) premiums. With the extra flexibility, you can reduce the premium when needed without losing your policy.

    The old school Infinite Banking practitioners never used blended whole life policies. They believed them to be either too risky or unnecessary. Instead, they used a combination of base premium plus paid-up additions. This made the policy more rigid and less flexible. In some cases, it made the policy more stable, too. But, in many other cases, it simply increased the risk of lapse if a policyholder couldn’t afford the higher base premiums.

    Start With A Convertible Term Life Policy For Infinite Banking

    If you simply can’t afford the higher premiums of whole life insurance, don’t sweat it. Start with a convertible term insurance policy with one of the major mutuals. 

    Mutual companies sell convertible term insurance that can later be converted (clue is in the name) to dividend-paying whole life.

    Prioritize Your Infinite Banking Policy

    Sometimes, it just comes down to prioritizing your Infinite Banking policy over other expenses. You might not be able to afford to do everything you want to do this year. You’ll have to pick and choose what you can (or want to) afford. If spending money is a higher priority for you right now, then Infinite Banking isn’t for you. 

    If saving money is a priority, then it’ll be easier to get rid of unnecessary expenses, or expenses that are getting in the way of funding your new policy. By prioritizing your Infinite Banking policy, you’re providing capital for your future, and building real, long-term financial security for yourself and your family.

    Get to it.

  • The Mortality Head Fake: The rise in mortality rates shows the true power of life insurance

    For the past several years, this blog has basically been a rerun (highlights) of whatever is going on in my email list. 

    I didn’t have time to do an extra blog post on top of my normal daily emails, but shit has gotten ridiculous lately. The Narrative™ has come to the life insurance industry, and so I decided it’s time to come out of “retirement” and start publishing new stuff. 

    Boy, did I choose a doozy of a day to start doing this. 

    About those life insurance mortality rates…

    Last year, a lot of conspiracy-minded folks ran with an out-of-context headline, proclaiming:

    “Unprecedented: Deaths in Indiana for ages 18-64 are up 40%.”

    The implication of the headline is that life insurance companies are in trouble due to unusually high mortality rates caused by COVID-19, risky vaccines, increased drug use and “deaths of despair”, you name it. There were some blogs even reporting that life insurance companies weren’t paying death claims, that the industry is on the brink of collapse, and that millions of Americans risk having their life insurance wiped out, along with all their personal and retirement savings (much of which is wrapped up inside of life insurance and annuity contracts). 

    The story appears to have originated on The Center Square, and has spread like wildfire across the alt-media blogosphere. It’s reminiscent of the methods discussed in Ryan Holiday’s book, Trust Me, I’m Lying.

    I don’t know how much these folks know about the life insurance business, but my guess is… not much.

    Here’s why I say that:

    Some aspects of what’s being reported are true, but it doesn’t paint an accurate picture of the truth or the severity of what’s happening. So, while it’s true that death rates have increased in the group life insurance market by a significant percentage (and in the general population) compared to pre-pandemic levels, the situation is not nearly as dire as some would have you believe.

    And, in fact, total deaths remain relatively low when measured against the total U.S. population.

    When Scott Davison, CEO of One America, mentioned deaths increasing in the 18-64 age group in the webinar, he was specifically referring to people in the group insurance plans. Here’s Scott in his own words:

    Group life and disability is a strange animal. It’s not medically underwritten like individual policies are. Meaning, a person who is sick and otherwise uninsurable can still get group life insurance… just like they can get group health insurance. 

    And, because of this, group insurance plans introduce something called adverse selection——people who are the highest risk seek out more insurance than those who are the lowest risk. If you know you can’t get insurance, you immediately want lots and lots of it from anyone who will sell it to you… which is why it is well-known and uncontroversial that group plans skew towards people with co-morbidities and the otherwise uninsurable.

    This is either unknown to the alt-media blogosphere or somehow irrelevant to their narrative.

    The other thing is that, while there was a mortality spike in the fully underwritten individual life insurance market too, it peaked in Q3 of 2021. This squares with the insurance industry’s assessment of the situation that this is not a mortality trend but rather a mortality event.

    I know that’s thoroughly unsatisfying to the conspiracy-minded folks who desperately want mortality rates to go higher so they have something to publish, but the alt-media narrative being spread about a catastrophe in the life insurance business (and catastrophe everywhere else) is as phony as a football bat.

    The mainstream theory that “everything is caused by COVID” is also phony (and was phony from the very beginning), and that’s what’s driving people into the arms of the other side. 

    But, as the old saying goes, the enemy of your enemy is not your friend.

    The truth is that the situation is indeed dire, but not nearly as dire as they want it to be. Deaths in America still represent a tiny fraction of the total U.S. population. And, there are still more births than deaths in the U.S.

    Which is good for everyone, including the life insurance industry. While not a perfect representation of the general population, life insurance companies do tell us important information about mortality rates. And, what they’re telling us is people are dying at unusually high rates, but not enough to collapse an industry or go into panic mode. 

    We know this because life insurance companies are not imploding from a spike in deaths, nor are they raising the pure cost of insurance on fully underwritten life insurance policies, nor are they changing their underwriting procedures in response to COVID.

    Not only that, they are profiting like never before in the face of increased death claims. The “big 4” mutual life insurers (MassMutual, Northwestern Mutual, New York Life, and The Guardian) all declared record dividend payments this year. Life insurance dividends are evidence of an insurer’s profitability and performance. Even a smaller “old mutual”, like Penn Mutual, announced it would pay record dividends for 2022.

    On life insurance company solvency

    Another tangent to this alt-media narrative that is starting to bubble up from the cracks and crevices is the idea that the life insurance industry is in dire straights and will have to beg to be bailed out by the federal government.

    In reality, most life insurance companies today are well-capitalized and have more than enough surplus to cover a dramatic rise in mortality or unexpected expenses. Life insurers continue to increase policy reserves and surplus funds, and pay billions of dollars every year in life insurance claims—and those numbers steadily increase every year. 

    This money is paid out entirely by life insurers, with zero taxpayer dollars.

    Yet another tangent to the main narrative is that life insurers either have already stopped paying death claims or will stop paying death claims because of the rise in death rates.

    This is ridiculous. Life insurance companies are paying all valid death claims. I guess this rumor was so widespread back in March of 2021, the ACLI felt it necessary to make a public comment about it on its website:

    “A social media post appears to be behind the spread of entirely false information, suggesting a COVID-19 vaccine could be a factor a life insurer considers in the claims-paying process. The fact is that life insurers do not consider whether or not a policyholder has received a COVID vaccine when deciding whether to pay a claim. Life insurance policy contracts are very clear on how policies work, and what cause, if any, might lead to the denial of a benefit. A vaccine for COVID-19 is not one of them. Policyholders should rest assured that nothing has changed in the claims-paying process as a result of COVID-19 vaccinations.

    While it’s true that——from time to time——some life insurance death claims are contested by life insurers, those contested claims amount to just 0.6% of total claims filed. 

    Most common reason for an insurance company to contest a claim?

    Non-payment of premiums by the policyholder or the insured making false statements on an application. And, even then, most contested claims ultimately end up being paid anyway.

    How does this affect insurance company balance sheets?

    The 2021 Life Insurers Fact Book says it hasn’t hurt balance sheets at all.

    In 1960, total death benefits paid to beneficiaries was $3.3 billion. Death benefit payouts kept rising throughout the decades. In 2000, total death benefit payouts were $44.1 billion. In 2019, life insurers paid out $78.3 billion and in 2020, they paid $90.4 billion in death claims.

    In 1960, the life insurance industry held policy reserves of $98.4 billion and capital and surplus funds of $9.6 billion. By 2019, that number was $5.7 trillion, with capital and surplus funds of $441 billion. In 2020, those figures increased to $6.1 trillion and $454 billion, respectively.

    Both the mainstream/legacy and alt-media narratives make it sound like the life insurance industry is on the brink of failure or suffering some sort of catastrophic loss they won’t ever recover from.

    With trillions of dollars in policy reserves and hundreds of billions in surplus, and death benefits paid of just less than $100 billion, it’s not serious or honest to suggest the life insurance industry is in financial trouble.

    Why report falsehoods?

    Most media companies incentivize “iterative journalism” at the expense of waiting for fully developed and carefully edited stories. They dishonestly report “a-points”, like narrowly focusing on one subset of the insurance business, the specific payouts of one aspect of one life insurer’s business, or they make doomsday proclamations about dramatic increases in death claims.

    But, they conspicuously avoid reporting “the-points”, like absolute change in policy reserves, surplus, and death claims and total liabilities relative to total assets. They avoid talking about the big picture, overall health, of the life insurance industry and the total number of people living vs dying, total births vs. total deaths.

    And, most individuals are innocently and understandably ignorant about the life insurance industry. They have no reason to study this information and are easily fooled by media personalities. 

    A direct look at death rates

    We know the life insurance industry is fine, but what if the general population is not fine?

    What happens if you zoom out and look at this from a wider angle?

    Aside from looking at insurance company mortality experience, we could also look directly at total mortality in the U.S. to get a sense of the increase.

    The CDC’s final report shows 3,383,729 total deaths in the U.S. in 2020, which represents an increase over 2019 of 528,891. Of those who died, 350,831 are reported as “COVID-19 deaths”. 

    Final numbers for 2021 are not available yet at the time of this writing. However, provisional counts are available now. Provisional counts are not final counts, but they can still give us a clue of what the final count might be. As the weeks drag on, the provisional counts will be adjusted and it will become more clear what the final death count is for the year. 

    The current provisional count for 2021 is 3,385,329——an increase of 1,600 people. As of January 19, 2021, this puts the death count for 2021 very close to the death count for 2020.

    If this number holds, it means that——on net——things did not get much worse in 2021. We did not experience a massive increase in deaths as was predicted by all the doom-and-gloomers. Death rates did remain high, but as we’ll see, it’s still a very small percentage of the total U.S. population.

    Now… I rarely, if ever, take government reporting at face value. First of all, if government officials were really as good as those working in private industry, that’s where they’d be working——not in government. They’d be creating net values for others and society for a profit, not appropriating (i.e. stealing) the profits of others for bureaucratic programs.

    Secondly, government agencies are highly motivated to expand their own power and influence, but are also staffed by incompetent bureaucrats. And, because of this, I automatically assume any information or data generated by the government will be inflated or exaggerated or biased in some way that favors whatever narrative the government wants to promote. Or, it will be mucked up in some other way by incompetency.

    That said, let’s assume the government is somehow perfectly correct in its reporting and assumptions. To me, this represents the worst-case scenario.

    If true, then according to the government’s own data, COVID deaths represent just 0.11% of the total U.S. population. Let’s also assume Kirsch’s idea of a 40% increase in mortality in the general population is true. He writes that it would mean 75,000 new excess deaths per quarter. Over the course of an entire year, that’s 300,000 new excess deaths. 

    Add that to the 2020 death count, and it puts us at 3,683,729. Even if we add it to the provisional count for 2021, it doesn’t change the number or percentage by much. Kirsch assumes the 300,000 are not from COVID and are instead from some other new cause. 

    This means the hypothetical non-COVID/new cause of death represents about 0.09% of the total U.S. population. The combined COVID and hypothetical new non-COVID/some other cause of death is still only 0.20% of the total U.S. population. If we took the CDC’s total number of new deaths (528,891), that is roughly 0.16% of the total U.S. population. And, even if we looked at the total number of deaths in 2020, that is still just 1.03% of the total U.S. population. 

    That means a worst-case scenario is… ~99% of Americans are still alive, in spite of all the horrendous bullshit we’ve had to endure in 2020 and 2021.

    Compared to how the news media usually reports these things, it sounds very unimpressive though. The news media wishes more Americans were dead.

    So, the way they choose to report this is by reporting the relative change between 0.11% (COVID deaths/U.S. population) and 0.20% (COVID plus new non-COVID deaths/U.S. population), which is nearly double the number of deaths. If you wanted to make this really sensational, you would add in the increased number of deaths since 2019 as a percentage and then measure the relative change between 2019 and 2020. So, then, you might read “Bombshell: Deaths Double!” or “Deaths Triple!” or something like that. Or, you might report COVID deaths as a percentage of the total number of people who died, instead of looking at how many people died vs how many people lived (in order to put the death rate into perspective). Or, you might simply tell anecdotal stories of people who died, and really amp up the fear and anxiety by implying “this could happen to you, too!”

    By reporting relative increases, and omitting absolute increases as well as references to the total U.S. population, it makes things sound worse than they really are. But, at the same time, it also makes the media narrative much more “newsworthy” and compelling.

    Viewed from a wide angle, these are extremely small numbers. Yes, there is a dramatic increase in the number of deaths. Each one of those deaths was a person and each one of those people mean something. Let’s not minimize their loss, but let’s also not use it to exaggerate our situation.

    The absolute increase in the number of deaths from 2019 to 2020 is very small in absolute terms. The CDC’s final number is 528,891, which is 0.16% of the total U.S. population, and represents a roughly 18.5% increase in deaths from 2019. That’s how many more lives we lost in 2020.

    As morbid as this sounds, it’s ultimately good news for you, me, and America… and even folks who believe in the depopulation conspiracy theory——it means the overlords have failed. 

    For the normies in the room, it means the sky isn’t falling.

    And, that is a very important point to keep in mind. 

    Legacy media outlets, like Reuters, continue to scare the bejeezus out of people by reporting death counts for 2021 based on projected death counts or provisional death counts, without the benefit of a final death count, which takes a long time to finalize. For example, the final death count for 2020 was not published until NCHS Data Brief No. 427, dated December 2021. By then, the media had moved on.

    They also continue to carefully craft an end-of-days narrative, where all roads lead back to COVID-19, and where the “new normal” is to exist in a perpetual state of fear and anxiety.

    This is yet another problem with how nearly all journalism (left, right, center, alt-media) works today——its commitment to “iterative journalism” means reporting stories “as they develop” instead of waiting for all facts to settle before publishing a story. Good, accurate, honest, stories take time to develop. But, waiting to develop a good story also means you can’t be first to publish. Problem is, this “first to publish” idea is something modern news rooms (and the Internet, in general) value.

    Thus, don’t look to have accurate information about 2021 before the end of 2022.

    Something else to keep in mind is that we live in a world of “fat tails”. What this means is, usually, the world is never as bad as people assume it is. But, when it is bad, it’s usually much worse than people think it will be. And yet, this is an instance where it definitely is worse than assumed, and yet it’s still not catastrophic.

    Maybe it will be in the months and years ahead. But by that point, the cause will be oppressive government command-and-control tactics, not a low-risk novel cold virus for which most people can now safely develop natural immunity against and which is now adept at escaping multiple rounds of vaccination.

    Whether you believe the conspiracy about vaccines or not, both the mainstream and alt-media narratives are nonsensical and pointless. Neither COVID-19, nor the vaccines, are destroying the economy——the government’s response is.

    And, the news media is helping the government by terrorizing people, spreading false information, and refusing to report honest, accurate, objective news.

    Of course, none of these facts and logic will get in the way of the attention-grabbing and deliciously profitable legacy and alt-media narratives. The legacy media exists to pump fear, which they believe drives profits (i.e. “if it bleeds, it leads”). The alt-media exists to score points against legacy media corporations and to make money from their followers and True Believers.

    Neither of these groups are interested in honest journalism.

    For all types of media activists, it’s much easier to seek fame than build genuine self-esteem through deep introspection. Also, those bills won’t pay themselves. Thus, the market for hype, fear, conspiracy, and paranoia will never go away until or unless the market starts demanding something else.

    So, if you let yourself be drawn into it, you will get exactly what you deserve.